首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >Habermas, Pupil Voice, Rationalism, and Their Meeting with Lacan’s Objet Petit A
【24h】

Habermas, Pupil Voice, Rationalism, and Their Meeting with Lacan’s Objet Petit A

机译:哈贝马斯,学生的声音,理性主义,以及他们与拉康的Objet Petit A的会面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

‘Pupil voice’ is a movement within state education in England that is associated with democracy, change, participation and the raising of educational standards. While receiving much attention from educators and policy makers, less attention has been paid to the theory behind the concept of pupil voice. An obvious point of theoretical departure is the work of Jürgen Habermas, who over a number of decades has endeavoured to develop a theory of democracy that places strong significance on language, communication and discourse. This paper is an attempt to gauge the usefulness of Habermas’ approach to understanding the theory of pupil voice, in particular how his theory of universal pragmatics lends itself to a ‘philosophy of between’, a philosophy that finds echoes in the conflicted nature of schooling that ‘pupil voice’ is supposed to rectify to some extent. The paper also explores the drawbacks of a Habermasian approach, in particular his overreliance on rationality as a way of understanding communication. Lacan’s concept of the objet petit a is introduced as an alternative way of understanding pupil voice.
机译:“学生之声”是英格兰州立教育中的一项运动,与民主,变革,参与和教育水平的提高有关。在受到教育者和政策制定者的广泛关注的同时,对学生声音概念背后的理论的关注也有所减少。哈尔马斯(JürgenHabermas)的工作是理论上一个明显的出发点,他数十年来一直致力于发展一种民主理论,该理论对语言,交流和话语具有重要意义。本文试图衡量哈贝马斯理解学生声音理论的方法的有用性,特别是他的通用语用学理论如何使其适用于“介于两者之间的哲学”,这种哲学在学校教育的冲突本质中找到了回声。 “学生的声音”应该在某种程度上得到纠正。本文还探讨了哈贝马斯方法的弊端,特别是他过分依赖理性作为理解交流的一种方式。引入了拉康(Lacan)小型物体的概念,作为理解学生声音的另一种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号