首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >ARE COLLECTIVE POLITICAL ACTIONS AND PRIVATE POLITICAL ACTIONS SUBSTITUTES OR COMPLEMENTS? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA'S PRIVATE SECTOR
【24h】

ARE COLLECTIVE POLITICAL ACTIONS AND PRIVATE POLITICAL ACTIONS SUBSTITUTES OR COMPLEMENTS? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA'S PRIVATE SECTOR

机译:集体政治行动和私人政治行动是替代还是补全?来自中国私人部门的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines the circumstances under which collective and private corporate political actions are more likely to be substitutes or complements. Using data based on a series of nationwide surveys conducted on privately owned firms in China, I find that firms that are engaged in collective political actions are more likely to pursue private political actions. This positive relationship is stronger in less economically developed provinces and when there are greater opportunities for the state to redistribute economic resources in product and capital markets. Meanwhile, this relationship is weaker in the presence of heavier regulatory burdens and for firms in which the state has some equity or owned by individuals who had prior political careers. These findings contribute to the corporate political action literature.
机译:本文研究了在何种情况下集体和私营公司的政治行为更可能是替代或补充。利用对中国私营企业进行的一系列全国性调查得出的数据,我发现从事集体政治活动的企业更有可能从事私营政治活动。在经济欠发达的省份中,当国家有更多机会在产品和资本市场中重新分配经济资源时,这种积极关系就更加牢固。同时,在存在更大的监管负担的情况下,对于国家拥有一定股权或拥有过先前政治生涯的个人所拥有的公司而言,这种关系更加脆弱。这些发现有助于公司的政治行动文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号