...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >A data-based regional scale autoregressive rainfall-runoff model: a study from the Odra River
【24h】

A data-based regional scale autoregressive rainfall-runoff model: a study from the Odra River

机译:基于数据的区域尺度自回归降雨径流模型:来自奥德拉河的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper aims to compare the performances of multivariate autoregressive (MAR) techniques and univariate autoregressive (AR) methods applied to regional scale rainfall-runoff modelling. We focus on the case study from the upper and middle reaches of the Odra River with its main tributaries in SW Poland. The rivers drain both the mountains (the Sudetes) and the lowland (Nizina Slaska). The region is exposed to extreme hydrologic and meteorological events, especially rain-induced and snow-melt floods. For the analysis, four hydrologic and meteorological variables are chosen, i.e., discharge (17 locations), precipitation (7 locations), thickness of snow cover (7 locations) and groundwater level (1 location). The time period is November 1971-December 1981 and the temporal resolution of the time series is of 1 day. Both MAR and AR models of the same orders are fitted to various subsets of the data and subsequently forecasts of discharge are derived. In order to evaluate the predictions the stepwise procedure is applied to make the validation independent of the specific sample path of the stochastic process. It is shown that the model forecasts peak discharges even 2-4 days in advance in the case of both rain-induced and snow-melt peak flows. Further-rnmore, the accuracy of discharge predictions increases if one analyses the combined data on discharge, precipitation, snow cover, and groundwater level instead of the pure discharge multivariate time series. MAR-based discharge forecasts based on multivariate data on discharges are more accurate than AR-based univariate predictions for a year with a flood, however, this relation is reverse in the case of the free-of-flooding year. In contrast, independently of the occurrence of floods within a year, MAR-based discharge forecasts based on discharges, precipitation, snow cover, and groundwater level are more precise than AR-based predictions.
机译:本文旨在比较应用于区域尺度降雨径流模拟的多元自回归(MAR)技术和单变量自回归(AR)方法的性能。我们重点研究奥得河上游和中游的案例,其主要支流在波兰西南部。河流流经高山(苏迪特人)和低地(尼兹娜·斯拉斯卡)。该地区面临极端的水文和气象事件,特别是雨水和融雪洪水。为了进行分析,选择了四个水文和气象变量,即流量(17个位置),降水(7个位置),积雪厚度(7个位置)和地下水位(1个位置)。时间段是1971年11月-1981年12月,时间序列的时间分辨率是1天。相同阶次的MAR和AR模型都适用于数据的各个子集,并随后导出流量的预测。为了评估预测,采用逐步过程使验证独立于随机过程的特定样本路径。结果表明,在降雨和融雪高峰流量的情况下,该模型甚至可以提前2-4天预测高峰流量。此外,如果人们分析排放,降水,积雪和地下水位的组合数据,而不是单纯的排放多元时间序列,则排放预测的准确性会提高。基于洪水排放多变量数据的基于MAR的流量预测比发生洪水的一年的基于AR的单变量预测更为准确,但是,对于无洪水年份而言,这种关系是相反的。相反,与一年之内的洪水无关,基于流量,降水,积雪和地下水位的基于MAR的流量预测比基于AR的预测更为精确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号