首页> 外文期刊>Spaces & Flows >A Walled Academic Urban Fortress: Using Neoliberal Urban Policies to Redesign and Maintain Chicago's Hyde Park Neighborhood
【24h】

A Walled Academic Urban Fortress: Using Neoliberal Urban Policies to Redesign and Maintain Chicago's Hyde Park Neighborhood

机译:围墙的学术城市要塞:使用新自由主义城市政策重新设计和维护芝加哥海德公园附近

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, I examine the historical metamorphosis of Hyde Park, home of the University of Chicago (UC) which has evolved from an almost exclusively "white" middle- to upper-class railroad suburb of Chicago into a carefully controlled multi-racial, fortress-like academic-corporate neighborhood dominated and shaped by UC's economic and political clout. For several decades, racially restrictive covenants supported by the UC kept blacks out until the Supreme Court's ban of the covenants in 1948 eventually brought more lower-income blacks to Hyde Park. This in turn led to white flight, overcrowding, and further neighborhood deterioration. Using the social Darwinist human ecology approach, in the 1950s the UC sponsored one of the largest urban renewal plans in the nation in Hyde Park with the goal of combatting urban blight and creating an elite, middle class multi-racial community. As a consequence Hyde Park's lower-income African American population fell by forty percent, its average household income soared by seventy percent; and with the remaining large population of well-to-do black residents it became one of Chicago's most racially diverse yet segregated neighborhoods. Despite these efforts, by 2000 Hyde Park lost almost half of its pre-urban renewal population, resulting in further deterioration of residential and commercial areas. Once again, with substantial financial backing of the UC during the last ten years community movers and shakers joined forces to save the neighborhood. In what some have dubbed as Hyde Park's "second urban renewal," and using Neoliberal urban governance principles, these efforts culminated in development of Harper Court, a mixed-use, academic/corporate-commercial neighborhood block with the objective of revitalizing a blighted retail district several blocks northeast of campus. In the final analysis, Hyde Park's movers and shakers have adopted a policy of eliminating urban blight within their neighborhood, and cordoning/sealing blight that is taking place in neighboring communities. The success of the second urban renewal plan is yet to be seen, but using comparative crime reports and socio-economic data for South Side Chicago neighborhoods I make the case that although racially mixed, Hyde Park continues to remain a physically and socially separate academic urban fortress surrounded by poor and racially segregated black neighborhoods.
机译:在本文中,我研究了芝加哥大学(UC)所在地海德公园(Hyde Park)的历史变态,它已从几乎完全是“白色”的中产阶级至上层阶级的铁路郊区演变成经过精心控制的多种族,加州大学的经济和政治影响力主导并塑造了堡垒般的学术企业社区。几十年来,在UC的支持下,种族限制的盟约一直将黑人拒之门外,直到1948年最高法院对盟约的禁令最终将更多低收入黑人带入海德公园。反过来,这导致了白人逃亡,人满为患以及邻里进一步恶化。 1950年代,加州大学采用社会达尔文主义人类生态学方法,发起了海德公园全国最大的城市更新计划之一,目的是与城市疾病作斗争并建立精英的中产阶级多种族社区。结果,海德公园的低收入非裔美国人人口减少了40%,其平均家庭收入猛增了70%。剩下的大量富裕的黑人居民成为芝加哥最种族多样化但又偏远的社区之一。尽管做出了这些努力,到2000年,海德公园仍失去了近一半的城市更新人口,导致住宅和商业区的进一步恶化。过去十年来,在UC的大量财政支持下,社区推动者和振动者再次联手拯救了社区。在某些人称为海德公园(Hyde Park)的“第二次城市更新”中,并采用了新自由主义的城市治理原则,这些努力最终导致了哈珀法院的发展,哈珀法院是一个多功能的,学术/企业/商业社区的街区,目的是振兴衰落的零售业。区位于校园东北数个街区。归根结底,海德公园(Hyde Park)的搬家和搬家公司采取了消除附近社区内城市枯萎病和在邻近社区中进行封锁/密封枯萎病的政策。第二个城市更新计划的成功还有待观察,但是使用芝加哥南部居民区的比较犯罪报告和社会经济数据,我得出的结论是,尽管种族混血,海德公园仍然是一个物理上和社会上分离的学术城市堡垒被贫穷和种族隔离的黑色社区所包围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号