首页> 外文期刊>South Asia Economic Journal >What Works Best for the Poor in Rural India: Poverty-lending Approach or Financial Systems Approach?
【24h】

What Works Best for the Poor in Rural India: Poverty-lending Approach or Financial Systems Approach?

机译:什么是最适合印度农村贫困人口的方法:减贫方法还是金融系统方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Financial sector development serves poor directly through poverty-lending approach or financial systems approach. Robinson (2001) questions the appropriateness of poverty-lending approach for the extremely poor and supports the financial systems approach for providing a poverty alleviation toolbox to serve the poor at various levels. The present study attempts to assess the effectiveness of the two lending approaches and comments on the appropriateness of the same for the poor and the poorest of the poor in rural India using state-wise annual data from 1999-2000 to 2011-2012. We conduct a panel data analysis for a sample of 15 major Indian states and provide an empirical evidence for the effect of various poverty alleviation tools on the poor and the poorest of the poor in rural India. The study partially supports the use of tools suggested by Robinson.
机译:金融部门的发展通过扶贫方法或金融系统方法直接为穷人服务。罗宾逊(Robinson,2001年)质疑赤贫方法对极端贫困者的适用性,并支持金融系统的方法来提供扶贫工具箱,以服务于各个层次的贫困者。本研究试图使用1999-2000年至2011-2012年的国家年度数据,评估这两种贷款方法的有效性,并就这两种方法对印度农村贫困人口和最贫困人口的适用性进行评论。我们对印度15个主要州的样本进行了面板数据分析,并为各种减贫工具对印度农村地区的贫困人口和最贫困人口的影响提供了经验证据。该研究部分支持Robinson建议的工具的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号