...
首页> 外文期刊>Sound & Communications >'Sounds Bad? Sounds Good?' Redux
【24h】

'Sounds Bad? Sounds Good?' Redux

机译:听起来不好?听起来不错?' Redux

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Back in July 2017, I penned a piece entitled, "Sounds Bad? Sounds Good? Who Knows The Difference Anymore?" It's a great read—especially if you grew up listening to music out of loudspeakers bigger than a tissue box! In fact, that column is one of my most widely read on Sound & Communications' website. During this past InfoComm, I moderated two panel discussions. Both sessions were great, packed with industry leaders to the point of being standing room only. The first was entitled, "AV/IT Best Practices for Unified Communications & Collaboration (UC&C)"; the second was entitled, "The Future of Workspace Design." This was my first time volunteering like this for InfoComm, and I enjoyed doing so. However, although most of the comments—perhaps 90 percent—were positive, a few people thought I was steering the discussion toward the issue of sound quality. And, admittedly, I was!
机译:早在2017年7月,我写了一篇题为“听起来不好?听起来很好?谁又知道区别了?”的文章。这是一本很棒的书,特别是如果您长大后会从比纸巾盒大的扬声器中听音乐!实际上,该专栏是我在Sound&Communications网站上阅读最多的文章之一。在过去的InfoComm期间,我主持了两个小组讨论。两次会议都很棒,挤满了行业领导者,使他们只能站起来。第一个标题为“统一通信和协作(UC&C)的AV / IT最佳实践”;第二个主题是“工作区设计的未来”。这是我第一次为InfoComm这样的志愿者,我很喜欢这样做。但是,尽管大多数评论(也许是90%)是正面的,但仍有少数人认为我正在将讨论转向音质问题。而且,诚然,我是!

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号