首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science Society of America Journal >Deriving Transport Parameters from Transient Flow Leaching Experiments by Approximate Steady-State Flow Convection-Dispersion Models
【24h】

Deriving Transport Parameters from Transient Flow Leaching Experiments by Approximate Steady-State Flow Convection-Dispersion Models

机译:近似稳态流对流扩散模型从瞬态流浸实验推导输运参数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The applicability of two different steady-state flow approximations of the convection–dispersion equation (CDE) to derive transport parameters from time series of concentrations or breakthrough curves (BTCs) that are observed during transient flow leaching experiments was evaluated. In the first often-used approximation, the time coordinate was transformed to a cumulative drainage coordinate, I, assuming that the water content remained constant during the leaching experiment. In the second approximation, the time coordinate was transformed to a solute penetration depth, , assuming that the flow rate and water content remained constant with depth across the solute displacement front. Comparisons of numerical solutions of the CDE for transient flow conditions with analytical solutions of the approximate steady-state models revealed that the first approximate model underestimates the dispersion of the BTC when the water content fluctuates considerably during the leaching experiment. Alternatively, fitting this model to a BTC as a function of I results in an overestimation of the dispersion coefficient D and the dispersivity . Since the second approximate model described the simulated BTCs well, good estimates of D and were obtained when this model was fitted to a BTC as a function of . If is a function of the flow rate Jw, the fitted could be related to an effective or flux-weighted average flow rate so that the soil specific relation (Jw) could be defined.
机译:对流扩散方程(CDE)的两种不同稳态流量近似值 从浓度或突破时间序列s 导出 传输参数的适用性评估了在瞬时流浸实验中观察到的>曲线(BTC)。在第一个常用的近似中,假设水含量在测量过程中保持恒定,则 时间坐标转换为累积排水量 坐标I。浸出实验。在第二种近似方法中,假设流量和水含量保持与深度恒定的 时间坐标转换为溶质渗透深度 穿过溶质位移前沿。瞬态流动条件下CDE数值解的比较 与近似稳态模型的解析解 揭示了第一个近似模型低估了浸出实验期间,当水含量波动很大时,BTC的 分散。或者,根据I将这个 模型拟合到BTC会导致色散系数D和色散系数的高估 。由于第二个近似模型很好地描述了 模拟的BTC,因此当将该模型作为B的函数拟合到BTC时,可以很好地估计D并获得 。如果is 是流量J w 的函数,则拟合可与 与有效或通量加权平均流量相关,从而使可以定义 土壤特定关系(J w )。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Soil Science Society of America Journal》 |2000年第4期|1317-1327|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Land and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Vital Decosterstraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;

    Institute for Land and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Vital Decosterstraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;

    Institute for Land and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Vital Decosterstraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号