首页> 外文期刊>Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering >On the verification of superposition method of kinematic interaction and inertial interaction in dynamic response analysis of soil-pile-structure systems
【24h】

On the verification of superposition method of kinematic interaction and inertial interaction in dynamic response analysis of soil-pile-structure systems

机译:运动-惯性叠加方法在土-桩-结构系统动力响应分析中的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A simplified analytical formulation has been used to verify the superposition method of two components of soil-structure interactions (SSI), namely-the kinematic interaction and the inertial interaction for estimating the dynamic response of soil-pile-structure systems (SPSS). The dynamic response analysis is conducted in the frequency domain and the soil behavior ranging from elastic-to-inelastic state is covered. The effective foundation input motion (EFIM) is obtained from shaking table model testing under 1gconditions for the kinematic interaction and the pile head impedance functions (IFs) are estimated from pile-head loading test for the inertial interaction, respectively. The EFIM and pile head IFs both have frequency and loading amplitude dependent characteristics. These experimentally recorded EFIM and pile head IFs are used as inputs in the analytical formulations to compute the dynamic response of the SPSS by superimposing the kinematic and inertial interaction. Superimposing adopts a linear interpolation method for appropriate use of the pile head IFs. The analytical (superimposed) dynamic response is then compared with experimentally measured dynamic response for verification purpose of superposition method and the comparison shows good agreement indicating that with appropriate use of EFIM and IFs, superposition method is reasonably good to produce the frequency and amplitude dependent dynamic response characteristics of SPSS. Certain discrepancies in amplification ratio and in resonant frequency particularly around the dominant vibrating modes have been observed in the comparison. The reason for such observed disagreements is possibly the difference between soil damping (hysteretic and radiation) and the difference between soil-pile stiffness.
机译:一种简化的分析公式已被用来验证土-结构相互作用(SSI)的两个分量的叠加方法,即运动学相互作用和惯性相互作用,以估算土-桩-结构系统(SPSS)的动力响应。在频域上进行了动力响应分析,涵盖了从弹性到非弹性状态的土壤行为。有效地基输入运动(EFIM)是通过在1g条件下进行振动相互作用的振动台模型试验获得的,而桩头阻抗函数(IFs)则是通过惯性相互作用的桩头载荷试验来估算的。 EFIM和桩头IF均具有频率和载荷振幅相关的特性。这些实验记录的EFIM和桩头IF在分析公式中用作输入,以通过叠加运动和惯性相互作用来计算SPSS的动态响应。叠加采用线性插值方法来适当使用桩头IF。然后,将分析的(叠加的)动态响应与实验测量的动态响应进行比较,以验证叠加方法的目的,并且比较显示出很好的一致性,表明在适当使用EFIM和IF的情况下,叠加方法对于产生依赖于频率和幅度的动态是相当好的SPSS的响应特性。在比较中观察到了放大率和共振频率的某些差异,特别是在主要振动模式附近。观察到这种分歧的原因可能是土壤阻尼(滞后和辐射)之间的差异以及土桩刚度之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号