首页> 外文期刊>Socio-Economic Review >Non-union representation and employer intent: how Canadian courts and labour boards determine the legal status of non-union plans
【24h】

Non-union representation and employer intent: how Canadian courts and labour boards determine the legal status of non-union plans

机译:非工会代表和雇主意图:加拿大法院和劳工委员会如何确定非工会计划的法律地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Non-union employee associations are neither banned nor protected in Canada. Issues arise when the employer's intent, or the effect of these associations, thwarts unions or deprives employees of their right to unionize. Thirty Canadian cases are examined involving: (i) employee associations applying for union status; (ii) non-union associations colliding with union organizing campaigns and (iii) the Supreme Court case favouring a non-union plan for the national police over unionization.
机译:非工会组织在加拿大不受禁止或保护。当雇主的意图或这些协会的影响阻碍工会或剥夺雇员的工会权利时,就会出现问题。审查了30例加拿大案件,涉及:(i)申请工会身份的员工协会; (ii)与工会组织运动相冲突的非工会协会,以及(iii)赞成国家警察针对工会制定非工会计划的最高法院案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Socio-Economic Review》 |2006年第2期|321-336|共16页
  • 作者

    Daphne G. Taras;

  • 作者单位

    Professor of Industrial Relations Institute for Advanced Policy Research and Haskayne School of Business University of Calgary 2500 University Drive N.W. Calgary Alberta Canada T2N 1N4;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号