首页> 外文期刊>Socio-Economic Review >The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘social market economy’
【24h】

The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘social market economy’

机译:欧洲一体化的不对称性,或为什么欧盟不能成为“社会市场经济”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Judge-made law has played a crucial role in the process of European integration. In the vertical dimension, it has greatly reduced the range of autonomous policy choices in the member states, and it has helped to expand the reach of European competences. At the same time, however, ‘integration through law’ does have a liberalizing and deregulatory impact on the socio-economic regimes of European Union member states. This effect is generally compatible with the status quo in liberal market economies, but it tends to undermine the institutions and policy legacies of Continental and Scandinavian social market economies. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, this structural asymmetry cannot be corrected through political action at the European level.
机译:法官制定的法律在欧洲一体化进程中发挥了关键作用。在垂直方面,它大大减少了成员国自主政策选择的范围,并有助于扩大欧洲能力的范围。但是,与此同时,“法律整合”确实对欧盟成员国的社会经济制度产生了自由化和放松管制的影响。这种影响通常与自由市场经济体的现状相适应,但它往往会破坏大陆和斯堪的纳维亚社会市场经济体的制度和政策遗留。鉴于欧洲立法对共识的要求很高,因此无法通过欧洲一级的政治行动来纠正这种结构性的不对称。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Socio-Economic Review》 |2010年第2期|p.211-250|共40页
  • 作者

    Fritz W. Scharpf;

  • 作者单位

    Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号