首页> 外文OA文献 >The asymmetry of European integration: or why the EU cannot be a 'Social Market Economy'
【2h】

The asymmetry of European integration: or why the EU cannot be a 'Social Market Economy'

机译:欧洲一体化的不对称性:或者为什么欧盟不能成为“社会市场经济”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

"Judge-made law has played a crucial role in the process of European integration. In the vertical dimension, it has greatly reduced the range of autonomous policy choices in the member states, and it has helped to expand the reach of European competences. At the same time, however, 'Integration through Law' does have a liberalizing and deregulatory impact on the socioeconomic regimes of EU member states. This effect is generally compatible with the status quo in liberal market economies, but it tends to undermine the institutions and policy legacies of Continental and Scandinavian social market economies. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, this structural asymmetry cannot be corrected through political action at the European level." (author's abstract)
机译:“法官制定的法律在欧洲一体化进程中发挥了至关重要的作用。在纵向方面,它大大减少了成员国自主政策选择的范围,并有助于扩大欧洲能力的范围。但是,“通过法律进行一体化”确实对欧盟成员国的社会经济制度产生了自由化和放松管制的影响,这种效果通常与自由市场经济的现状相适应,但它往往会破坏制度和政策。大陆和斯堪的纳维亚社会市场经济的遗产。鉴于欧洲立法的高度共识要求,这种结构性的不对称不能通过欧洲一级的政治行动加以纠正。” (作者的摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Scharpf Fritz W.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号