首页> 外文期刊>Social Semiotics >Deictic use as a threshold for imaginative thinking: a Peircean perspective
【24h】

Deictic use as a threshold for imaginative thinking: a Peircean perspective

机译:忠实使用作为想象力思维的门槛:皮尔士的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This investigation traces the ontogeny of the use of “I” and how its symbolic use promotes imaginative thinking. Peirce's triadic system is contrasted with Vygotsky's binary system to highlight the import of Thirdness in characterizing the ontogeny of person deictics within conversational roles. Person deictics, such as “I”, are first indexes. Later when their social function/meaning is apprehended, they serve as symbols as well; still later they are used psychologically in self to self monologues, and acquire distinctive interpretants when used unconventionally. Early indexical uses of “I” are non-symbolic - “I” referring to self only absent recognition of conversational roles. “I” is employed symbolically when its referent shifts and when its invariant meaning (speaker) is apprehended. Person deictics enhance the emergence of imagination when the symbolic use transcends their inter-psychological regulation through human to human conversation to their intra-psychological function in self to self discourse. Extension of functional roles (speaker/listener) to dolls/puppets (in representational play scenarios) constitutes an extended use of the symbolic function because inanimates cannot assume conversational roles; and such use triggers the association of different interpretants to the category of deictic use. The symbolic use of “I” as speaker facilitates apprehension of self as object, which is a major determinant of when in ontogeny children extend the use of person deictics from Dynamic to Final interpretants.View full textDownload full textKeywordsThirdness, Peirce, Vygotsky, symbol, interpretant, deictics, imagination, self, indexRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.607968
机译:这项调查追溯了“ I”的使用的本体论,以及其象征性使用如何促进想象力的思考。皮尔斯的三元体系与维果茨基的二元体系形成对比,突出了第三性的重要性,以表征对话角色中人的行为论的本体论。人的行为,例如“ I”,是第一指标。后来,当他们的社会功能/意义被理解时,它们也充当了象征。再后来,他们在心理上将自己用于独白,并在非常规使用时获得了独特的口译。 “ I”的早期索引用法是非符号性的-“ I”是指仅自我而没有对对话角色的认识。当“ I”的指称发生变化并且理解其不变含义(说话者)时,将象征性地使用“ I”。当象征性用法通过人与人之间的对话超越自身的心理间调节,使其在自我对自身话语中的内部心理功能发挥作用时,人的行为学就增强了想象力的出现。将功能角色(说话者/听众)扩展到玩偶/布偶(在具有代表性的游戏场景中)构成了符号功能的扩展用途,因为无生命的人不能承担对话角色;并且这种使用触发了不同解释者与专用使用类别的关联。 “我”作为说话人的象征性用法有助于理解作为对象的自我,这是决定个体发育中儿童何时将人的行为学从动态解释学延伸到最终解释学的主要决定因素。全文阅读全文关键词,符号,解释器,奉献精神,想象力,自我,索引相关的变量add add_id ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.607968

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Semiotics》 |2011年第5期|p.665-682|共18页
  • 作者

    Donna E. Westa*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:07:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号