首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences in China >Why Has the Business Cycle in China Become More Stable in the Twenty‐first Century?
【24h】

Why Has the Business Cycle in China Become More Stable in the Twenty‐first Century?

机译:为什么中国的商业周期在20世纪会变得更加稳定?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

21 21 21 ——GDP CPIGDPCPI :   The purpose of this paper is to answer two questions: first, what are the causes of the stability of the Chinese business cycle in the twenty‐first century? Second, what are the sources of volatility for the Chinese economy in the twenty‐first century? Using statistical analysis and constructing a multi‐equation structural macro‐economic model, we find the answer to the first question depends almost totally on domestic factors, including the stability of domestic demand shock and the automatic stabilization mechanism existing in the credit market. As to the second question, the greatest sources of volatility are foreign and domestic demand shocks, with the former having a greater effect on the volatility of GDP while the latter has a greater effect on the CPI. Another finding is that traditional monetary policy targeting money supply has little effect on the stability of GDP and CPI. One policy suggestion is that a domestic stimulus policy to stabilize aggregate demand is still vital against the background of the global crisis; another is that to get rid of negative impact of globalization upon our economy, we need to rely more on urbanization rather than industrialization and need to re‐adjust the economic roles of different regions within China.View full textDownload full textKeywordsbusiness cycle, globalization, stabilityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2011.548918
机译:21 21 21 – GDP CPIGDPCPI:–本文的目的是回答两个问题:首先,什么是导致二十一世纪中国经济周期稳定的原因? ?第二,在二十一世纪中国经济的动荡根源是什么?使用统计分析并构建多方程结构宏观经济模型,我们发现第一个问题的答案几乎完全取决于国内因素,包括国内需求冲击的稳定性和信贷市场中存在的自动稳定机制。关于第二个问题,波动的最大来源是外国和国内需求冲击,前者对GDP波动的影响更大,而后者对CPI的影响更大。另一个发现是,针对货币供应的传统货币政策对GDP和CPI的稳定性影响很小。一种政策建议是,在全球危机的背景下,用于稳定总需求的国内刺激政策仍然至关重要。另一个是,要摆脱全球化对我们经济的负面影响,我们需要更多地依赖于城市化而不是工业化,并且需要重新调整中国不同地区的经济作用。查看全文下载全文关键字经济周期,全球化,稳定相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2011.548918

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号