首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Why the Pirate Party Won the German Election of 2009 or The Trouble With Predictions: A Response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. 'Predicting Elections With Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment'
【24h】

Why the Pirate Party Won the German Election of 2009 or The Trouble With Predictions: A Response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. 'Predicting Elections With Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment'

机译:海盗党为何赢得2009年德国大选或“预测麻烦”:对Tumasjan,A.,Sprenger,T. O.,Sander,P. G.和Welpe,I.M.的回应“用Twitter预测选举:关于政治情绪的140个字符揭示了什么”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In their article "Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment," the authors Andranik Tumasjan, Timm O. Sprenger, Philipp G. Sandner, and Isabell M. Welpe (TSSW) the authors claim that it would be possible to predict election outcomes in Germany by examining the relative frequency of the mentions of political parties in Twitter messages posted during the election campaign. In this response we show that the results of TSSW are contingent on arbitrary choices of the authors. We demonstrate that as of yet the relative frequency of mentions of German political parties in Twitter message allows no prediction of election results.
机译:作者Andranik Tumasjan,Timm O. Sprenger,Philipp G. Sandner和Isabell M. Welpe(TSSW)在他们的文章“通过Twitter预测选举:140个字符会显示出政治情绪”中声称,有可能通过检查选举活动期间发布的Twitter消息中提及政党的相对频率,来预测德国的选举结果。在此回应中,我们表明,TSSW的结果取决于作者的任意选择。我们证明,到目前为止,Twitter消息中提及德国政党的相对频率尚无法预测选举结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号