首页> 外文期刊>Social Justice Research >Independent Self-Construal and Opposition to Affirmative Action: The Role of Microjustice and Macrojustice Preferences
【24h】

Independent Self-Construal and Opposition to Affirmative Action: The Role of Microjustice and Macrojustice Preferences

机译:独立的自我建构和对平权行动的反对:微观正义和宏观正义偏好的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why are people with a stronger independent self-construal more opposed to affirmative action than those with a weaker independent self-construal? Drawing on prior research, we predicted that this is because the former endorse microjustice principles—which are perceived to be violated by affirmative action—and disregard macrojustice principles—which affirmative action seeks to ensure. In contrast, people with a weak independent self-construal endorse both microjustice and macrojustice. The results from three studies support our reasoning. Our research contributes to theorizing on affirmative action by illuminating the important role of both microjustice and macrojustice concerns in predicting opposition to affirmative action. We discuss the implications of our research within the North American context for increasing people’s endorsement of macrojustice in an effort to mitigate opposition to social policies aimed at redressing societal injustice.
机译:为什么独立自主性较强的人比独立自主性较弱的人更反对平权行动?在先前研究的基础上,我们预测这是因为前者认可微正义原则(被认为是平权行动所违反),而无视宏观正义原则(该平权行动旨在确保这一点)。相比之下,独立自我建设能力较弱的人认可微观正义和宏观正义。三项研究的结果支持我们的推理。我们的研究通过阐明微观正义和宏观正义问题在预测对平等权利行动的反对中的重要作用,为理论上的平等权利做出了贡献。我们讨论了在北美范围内进行的研究对提高人们对宏观正义的认可的意义,以减轻人们对旨在纠正社会不公正现象的社会政策的反对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号