首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >An Exploratory Study of Trust and Material Hardship in Ghana
【24h】

An Exploratory Study of Trust and Material Hardship in Ghana

机译:加纳信任与物质困难的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We explore associations among interpersonal (thick and thin) and institutional (legislative, executive, and judicial) trust and material hardship outcomes in Ghana. We use data from the 2008 Afrobarometer survey. Material hardship is conceptualized in terms of frequency of going without five basic necessities/consumptive deprivations, each of which a separate outcome (food, water, medical care, cooking fuel, and cash income). Five multinomial logistic regression models are estimated. Models also include relevant socioeconomic and cultural factors. The stepwise forward entry method was used to identify important variables for each model, and common and unique predictors of each outcome are discussed. Results suggest that deprivations are trust-specific in Ghana. Interpersonal and institutional trust types matter differentially (for example, trust in parliamentational assembly is a unique food deprivation predictor; trust in courts is a unique water deprivation predictor; and trust in police is a unique cash income deprivation predictor). Common trust predictors across models are thin trust (trust in other Ghanaians) for predicting food and cooking fuel infrequency outcomes and executive trust for predicting water, medical care, and cash income infrequency outcomes. Some of the non-trust variables, like education and ethnicity, were prominent predictors of deprivation outcomes across all models. This is one of the beginning studies to explore micro-level data in an important area of trust and material hardship in Sub-Saharan Africa. The study also attempts to conceptualize material hardship within the context of a developing country and provides insightful results that could be beneficial to other research investigators and further probed in future studies building on this work. The study draws important implications for intervention policies based on analyses of material hardship composite parts which provide insights with great detail into specific target groups on specific component-outcomes.
机译:我们在加纳探讨人际关系(厚而薄弱)与机构(立法,行政和司法)信任与物质困难成果之间的联系。我们使用2008年非洲晴雨表的数据。物质上的困难是按照没有五种基本必需品/消耗性消费的频度来概念化的,每种基本必需品/消费性缺失都有各自的结果(食物,水,医疗,烹饪燃料和现金收入)。估计了五个多项式逻辑回归模型。模型还包括相关的社会经济和文化因素。使用逐步向前输入法来识别每个模型的重要变量,并讨论每个结果的共同和唯一预测因素。结果表明,剥夺在加纳是特定于信任的。人际和机构信任类型的重要性不同(例如,对议会/国民议会的信任是唯一的缺水预测因子;对法院的信任是唯一的缺水预测因子;对警察的信任是唯一的现金剥夺预测因子)。各个模型中常见的信任预测因素包括:稀疏信任(对其他加纳人的信任),用于预测食物和烹饪燃料的不频繁结果;执行信任,用于预测水,医疗和现金收入不频繁的结果。在所有模型中,某些非信任变量(例如教育和种族)是剥夺结果的重要预测因子。这是探索撒哈拉以南非洲重要信任和物质困难领域的微观数据的初步研究之一。该研究还试图在发展中国家的背景下将物质困难概念化,并提供有见地的结果,这可能对其他研究者有益,并在此工作的基础上进一步探讨。这项研究基于对材料困难复合材料零件的分析,对干预政策产生了重要影响,这些零件提供了对特定目标结果中特定目标群体的详细了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号