首页> 外文期刊>Social Choice and Welfare >Annexations and alliances: When are blocs advantageous a priori?
【24h】

Annexations and alliances: When are blocs advantageous a priori?

机译:兼并和联盟:何时有利于先验集团?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For any simple voting game (SVG), we consider the question posed in the title from two different points of view as to what voting power means. We also distinguish between blocs imposed by annexation and those formed voluntarily, and present some general theoretical results concerning these notions. We illustrate our theoretical findings with examples using both toy SVGs and the Qualified Majority Voting rule of the Council of Ministers of the European Community (CMEC). We show that when voting power is understood as influence (I-power), forming a voluntary bloc may be advantageous even if its voting power is smaller than the sum of the original powers of its members; and it may be disadvantageous even if its voting power is greater than that sum.
机译:对于任何简单的投票游戏(SVG),我们从两种不同的角度考虑标题中提出的问题,即投票权的含义。我们还区分了吞并和自愿组成的集团,并提供了有关这些概念的一些一般性理论结果。我们以玩具SVG和欧洲共同体部长理事会(CMEC)的合格多数投票规则为例,说明了我们的理论发现。我们证明,当投票权被理解为影响力(I-power)时,即使其投票权小于其成员原始权力之和,形成一个自愿集团也可能是有利的。即使其投票权大于该总和,也可能是不利的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Choice and Welfare》 |2002年第2期|295-312|共18页
  • 作者单位

    University of Haifa Mount Carmel Haifa 31905 Israel (e-mail: msdanfl@mscc.huji.ac.il);

    Department of Philosophy King's College Strand London WC2R 2LS UK (e-mail: moshe.machover@kcl.ac.uk);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号