首页> 外文期刊>The Singapore economic review >PARALLEL IMPORTS, INNOVATIONS AND NATIONAL WELFARE: THE ROLE OF THE SIZES OF INCOME CLASSES AND NATIONAL MARKETS FOR HEALTH CARE
【24h】

PARALLEL IMPORTS, INNOVATIONS AND NATIONAL WELFARE: THE ROLE OF THE SIZES OF INCOME CLASSES AND NATIONAL MARKETS FOR HEALTH CARE

机译:平行进口,创新和国家福利:收入类别和国家市场在卫生保健方面的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper shows that regardless of any intra-country income differences, parallel imports result in a lower level of health-care innovation but, contrary to popular as well as conventional theoretical wisdom, a lower price in the Third World compared to market-based discrimination. Despite such a lower price, however, parallel imports unambiguously make all buyers in the Third World worse off when intra-country income disparity exists. On the other hand, even discarding the MNC's profit, there will be cases in which the richer country prefers price discrimination as well. That is, in those cases, no countries will have any incentive under the welfare criterion to undo price discrimination, contrary to Richardson (2002).
机译:本文表明,不管国内收入之间的差异如何,平行进口都会导致较低的医疗保健创新水平,但与流行和传统的理论观点相反,与基于市场的歧视相比,第三世界的价格较低。尽管价格如此低廉,但是,当存在国内收入差异时,水货进口无疑会使第三世界的所有购买者的境况恶化。另一方面,即使抛弃跨国公司的利润,富裕国家也有可能也喜欢价格歧视。也就是说,在这种情况下,与理查森(Richardson,2002)相反,在福利标准下,没有任何国家可以消除价格歧视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号