首页> 外文期刊>Service Business >Pecking Order Theory versus Trade-Off Theory: are service SMEs’ capital structure decisions different?
【24h】

Pecking Order Theory versus Trade-Off Theory: are service SMEs’ capital structure decisions different?

机译:啄食顺序理论与权衡理论:服务中小企业的资本结构决策是否不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper seeks to analyse if the capital structure decisions of service small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are different from those of other types of firm. To do so, we consider four research samples: (i) 610 service SMEs; (ii) 126 service large firms; (iii) 679 manufacturing and construction SMEs; and (iv) 132 manufacturing and construction large firms. Using the two-step estimation method, the empirical evidence obtained in this study shows that the capital structure decisions of service SMEs are different from those of other types of firm. Service SMEs’ capital structure decisions are closer to the assumptions of Pecking Order Theory and further removed from those of Trade-Off Theory compared with the case of other types of firm.
机译:本文试图分析服务型中小企业的资本结构决策是否不同于其他类型企业的资本结构决策。为此,我们考虑了四个研究样本:(i)610个服务中小企业; (ii)126个服务大公司; iii 679个制造业和建筑业中小型企业; (iv)132个制造和建筑大公司。使用两步估计法,本研究获得的经验证据表明,服务型中小企业的资本结构决策与其他类型的公司不同。与其他类型的公司相比,服务业中小型企业的资本结构决策更接近啄食顺序理论的假设,并且与权衡理论相去甚远。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号