首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science
【24h】

A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science

机译:信息科学与图书馆学跨学科变化的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study employs the method of direct citation to analyze and compare the interdisciplinary characteristics of the two disciplines of library science and information science during the period of 1978–2007. Based on the research generated by five library science journals and five information science journals, library science researchers tend to cite publications from library and information science (LIS), education, business/management, sociology, and psychology, while researchers of information science tend to cite more publications from LIS, general science, computer science, technology, and medicine. This means that the disciplines with larger contributions to library science are almost entirely different from those contributing to information science. In addition, researchers of library science frequently cite publications from LIS; the rate is as high as 65.61%, which is much higher than the rate for information science, 49.50%. However, a decreasing trend in the percentage of LIS in library science indicates that library science researchers tend to cite more publications from non-LIS disciplines. A rising trend in the proportion of references to education sources is reported for library science articles, while a rising trend in the proportion of references to computer science sources has been found for information science articles. In addition, this study applies an interdisciplinary indicator, Brillouin’s Index, to measurement of the degree of interdisciplinarity. The results confirm that the trend toward interdisciplinarity in both information science and library science has risen over the years, although the degree of interdisciplinarity in information science is higher than that in library science.
机译:本研究采用直接引用的方法来分析和比较1978-2007年间图书馆学和信息科学两个学科的跨学科特征。根据五种图书馆学期刊和五种信息科学期刊的研究结果,图书馆学研究人员倾向于引用图书馆和信息科学(LIS),教育,商业/管理,社会学和心理学方面的出版物,而信息科学的研究人员倾向于引用LIS,通识科学,计算机科学,技术和医学的更多出版物。这意味着对图书馆学做出更大贡献的学科与对信息科学做出贡献的学科几乎完全不同。此外,图书馆学研究人员经常引用LIS的出版物。该比率高达65.61%,远高于信息科学的49.50%。但是,图书馆学领域LIS百分比的下降趋势表明,图书馆学研究人员倾向于引用非LIS学科的更多出版物。据报道,图书馆学文章中对教育资源的引用比例呈上升趋势,而信息科学文章中对计算机科学资源的引用比例呈上升趋势。此外,这项研究将跨学科指标布里渊指数用于衡量跨学科程度。结果表明,尽管信息科学的跨学科程度高于图书馆学,但多年来信息科学和图书馆学的跨学科趋势已经上升。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |2012年第3期|p.789-803|共15页
  • 作者

    Mu-Hsuan Huang; Yu-Wei Chang;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan;

    Department of Library and Information Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Interdisciplinary changes; Library science; Information science; Direct citation;

    机译:跨学科变化;图书馆学;信息科学;直接引用;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:46:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号