首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Low-drift nozzles vs. standard nozzles for pesticide application in the biological efficacy trials of pesticides in apple pest and disease control
【24h】

Low-drift nozzles vs. standard nozzles for pesticide application in the biological efficacy trials of pesticides in apple pest and disease control

机译:苹果农药在病虫害防治中的生物有效性试验中使用的低漂移喷嘴与标准喷嘴的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The coarse spray air-induction nozzles have documented pesticide drift reducing potential and hence pose lower risk of environmental pollution than the standard fine spray hollow cone nozzles. However, it is questioned that use of the low-drift nozzles might not provide as effective crop protection as the standard nozzles. The objective of work was to assess the pest and disease control efficacy as affected by spray volume rate and nozzle type. The experiment was carried out in apple orchard, cv Jonagold/M26. The evaluated treatments were combinations of three spray volume rates: 250, 500 and 750 l ha~(-1), and two types of nozzles: hollow cone nozzles generating very fine spray, and flat fan air induction nozzles producing coarse droplets. The biological performance of treatments was determined based on severity of diseases: apple scab (Venturia inaequalis), powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha) and bull's eye rot (Pezicula spp.), as well as population or damage caused by pests: green apple aphid (Aphis pomi), rosy apple aphid (Dysaphis plantaginea Pass.), woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum), apple rust mite (Aculus schlechtendali) and apple blossom weevil (Anthonomus pomorum L.). In general apple scab was equally controlled by all treatments. Only in the years of high infection pressure efficacy of powdery mildew control was better for fine spray nozzles and high volume rates. Green and rosy apple aphids were better controlled with higher volume rates, though significance of the advantage over the lower rates was occasional. No effect of spray quality on efficacy of aphid and mite control was found for any spray volume rate. Better control of apple blossom weevil and woolly apple aphid was achieved with the high spray volume rate providing heavy coverage to the point of run-off. The air induction nozzles having drift reducing potential are biologically efficacious alternative to conventional hollow cone nozzles.
机译:与标准的细喷空心锥形喷嘴相比,粗喷空气感应喷嘴已记录了降低农药漂移的潜力,因此对环境的污染风险较低。但是,有人质疑,使用低漂移喷嘴可能无法提供像标准喷嘴一样有效的农作物保护。工作的目的是评估受喷雾量和喷嘴类型影响的害虫和疾病控制功效。该实验是在苹果园,乔纳戈尔德(Jonagold)/ M26进行的。评估的处理方法是三种喷雾体积率的组合:250、500和750 l ha〜(-1),以及两种喷嘴:产生非常细微喷雾的空心圆锥形喷嘴和产生粗糙液滴的扁平风扇进气喷嘴。根据疾病的严重程度确定治疗的生物学性能:苹果黑斑病(Venturia inaequalis),白粉病(Podosphaera leucotricha)和牛眼腐烂(Pezicula spp。),以及由害虫引起的种群或损害:青苹果蚜虫(蚜虫),玫瑰色苹果蚜虫(Dysaphis plantaginea Pass。),羊毛苹果蚜虫(Eriosoma lanigerum),苹果锈螨(Aculus schlechtendali)和苹果花象鼻虫(Anthonomus pomorum L.)。一般而言,所有治疗均对苹果apple进行了同样的控制。仅在高感染压力的年份中,防白粉病的效果才对细喷嘴和高容积率更好。较高的体积比可更好地控制绿色和玫瑰色的苹果蚜虫,尽管偶尔会出现比较低的比例具有优势的重要性。对于任何喷雾体积率,喷雾质量对蚜虫和螨虫控制的功效均没有影响。通过高喷雾体积比,可以更好地控制苹果花象鼻虫和羊毛苹果蚜虫,从而为径流点提供较大的覆盖范围。具有降低漂移潜力的进气喷嘴在生物学上是常规空心锥形喷嘴的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号