首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Machine learning approaches for spatial modeling of agricultural droughts in the south-east region of Queensland Australia
【24h】

Machine learning approaches for spatial modeling of agricultural droughts in the south-east region of Queensland Australia

机译:机器学习方法对澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部地区的农业干旱进行空间建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A quantitative understanding of the hydro-environmental factors that influence the occurrence of agricultural drought events would enable more strategic climate change adaptation and drought management plans. Practical drought hazard mapping remains challenging due to possible exclusion of the most pertinent drought drivers, and to the use of inadequate predictive models that cannot describe drought adequately. This research aims to develop new approaches to map agricultural drought hazard with state-of-the-art machine learning models, including classification and regression trees (CART), boosted regression trees (BRT), random forests (RF), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) and support vector machines (SVM). Hydro-environmental datasets were used to calculate the relative departure of soil moisture (RDSM) for eight severe droughts for drought-prone southeast Queensland, Australia, over the period 1994-2013. RDSM was then used to generate an agricultural drought inventory map. Eight hydro-environmental factors were used as potential predictors of drought. The goodness-of-fit and predictive performance of all models were evaluated using different threshold-dependent and threshold-independent methods, including the true skill statistic (TSS), Efficiency (E), F-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC). The RF model (AUC-ROC = 97.7%, TSS = 0.873, E = 0.929, F-score = 0.898) yielded the highest accuracy, while the MA model (with AUC-ROC = 73.9%, TSS = 0.424, E = 0.719, F-score = 0.512) showed the worst performance. The plant available water holding capacity (PAWC), mean annual precipitation, and day content were the most important variables to be used for predicting the agricultural drought. About 21.2% of the area is in high or very high drought risk classes, and therefore, warrant drought and environmental protection policies. Importantly, the models do not require data on the precipitation anomaly for any given drought year; the spatial patterns in AGH were consistent for all drought events, despite very different spatial patterns in precipitation anomaly among events. Such machine-learning approaches are able to construct an overall risk map, thus assisting in the adoption of a robust drought contingency planning measure not only for this area, but also, in other regions where drought presents a pressing challenge, including its influence on key practical dimensions of social, environmental and economic sustainability. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:对影响农业干旱事件发生的水环境因素的定量了解将使气候变化适应和干旱管理计划更具战略意义。由于可能排除了最相关的干旱驱动因素,并且由于使用了不能充分描述干旱的不充分预测模型,因此实际的干旱危险图谱仍然具有挑战性。这项研究旨在开发利用最新的机器学习模型来绘制农业干旱危害图的新方法,包括分类和回归树(CART),增强回归树(BRT),随机森林(RF),多元自适应回归样条(MARS),灵活判别分析(FDA)和支持向量机(SVM)。使用水环境数据集来计算澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部1994-2013年间八次严重干旱的土壤湿度(RDSM)的相对偏离。然后使用RDSM生成农业干旱清单图。八个水环境因素被用作干旱的潜在预测因子。使用不同的阈值相关和阈值独立方法评估了所有模型的拟合优度和预测性能,包括真实技能统计量(TSS),效率(E),F得分以及接收者操作下的面积特性曲线(AUCROC)。 RF模型(AUC-ROC = 97.7%,TSS = 0.873,E = 0.929,F分数= 0.898)产生了最高的准确性,而MA模型(AUC-ROC = 73.9%,TSS = 0.424,E = 0.719) ,F分数= 0.512)显示了最差的性能。植物有效持水量(PAWC),年平均降水量和日均含量是用于预测农业干旱的最重要变量。该地区约21.2%处于高干旱风险等级或极高干旱风险等级,因此需要干旱和环境保护政策。重要的是,这些模型不需要任何给定干旱年份的降水异常数据。尽管所有事件之间降水异常的空间模式差异很大,但AGH的空间模式对于所有干旱事件都是一致的。这种机器学习方法能够构建总体风险图,从而不仅在该地区而且在干旱带来紧迫挑战(包括其对关键影响的影响)的其他地区,也都采用了强有力的干旱应急计划措施。社会,环境和经济可持续性的实际方面。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号