...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Democrastising expertise and socially robust knowledge
【24h】

Democrastising expertise and socially robust knowledge

机译:推翻专业知识和社交知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper presents arguments for the inherent 'transgressiveness' of expertise. First, it must address issues that can never be reduced to the purely scientific and purely technical, and hence must link up with diverse practices, institutions and actors. Second, it addresses audiences that are never solely composed of fellow-experts, whose expectations and modes of understanding reflect the heterogeneous experience of mixed audiences. Recent demands for greater accountability have created a vast site for social experimentation, especially on the supra-national level, which are briefly reviewed. However, the democratisation of expertise also creates tensions, especially on the institutional level. Moving from reliable knowledge towards socially robust knowledge may be one step forward in negotiating and bringing about a regime of pluralistic expertise.
机译:本文提出了专业知识固有的“侵略性”的观点。首先,它必须解决永远不能归结为纯粹科学和纯粹技术的问题,因此必须与各种实践,机构和参与者联系起来。其次,它解决的受众永远不仅仅由专家组成,他们的期望和理解方式反映了混合受众的异质体验。最近对加强问责制的要求为社会实验创造了广阔的空间,特别是在超国家层面,对此进行了简要回顾。但是,专业知识的民主化也造成了紧张局势,特别是在机构层面。从可靠的知识转向对社会稳定的知识可能是谈判和实现多元化专业知识体系的第一步。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2003年第3期|p. 151-156|共6页
  • 作者

    Helga Nowotny;

  • 作者单位

    Society in Science: The Branco Weiss Fellowship, ETH-Zentrum, HAA, CH - 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号