首页> 外文期刊>Science and Engineering Ethics >How Should We Foster the Professional Integrity of Engineers in Japan? A Pride-Based Approach
【24h】

How Should We Foster the Professional Integrity of Engineers in Japan? A Pride-Based Approach

机译:我们应该如何培养日本工程师的职业操守?基于骄傲的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I discuss the predicament that engineering-ethics education in Japan now faces and propose a solution to this. The predicament is professional motivation, i.e., the problem of how to motivate engineering students to maintain their professional integrity. The special professional responsibilities of engineers are often explained either as an implicit social contract between the profession and society (the “social-contract” view), or as requirements for membership in the profession (the “membership-requirement” view). However, there are empirical data that suggest that such views will not do in Japan, and this is the predicament that confronts us. In this country, the profession of engineering did not exist 10 years ago and is still quite underdeveloped. Engineers in this country do not have privileges, high income, or high social status. Under such conditions, neither the social-contract view nor the membership-requirement view is convincing. As an alternative approach that might work in Japan, I propose a pride-based view. The notion of pride has been analyzed in the virtue-ethics literature, but the full potential of this notion has not been explored. Unlike other kinds of pride, professional pride can directly benefit the general public by motivating engineers to do excellent work even without social rewards, since being proud of themselves is already a reward. My proposal is to foster a particular kind of professional pride associated with the importance of professional services in society, as the motivational basis for professional integrity. There is evidence to suggest that this model works.
机译:我讨论了日本工程伦理学教育现在面临的困境,并提出了解决方案。困境是职业动机,即如何激励工科学生保持职业素养的问题。工程师的特殊职业责任通常被解释为职业与社会之间的隐性社会契约(“社会契约”观点),或被解释为职业成员资格的要求(“成员资格要求”观点)。但是,有经验数据表明,这种观点在日本是行不通的,这是我们面临的困境。在这个国家,工程专业在10年前就不存在了,并且仍然很不发达。这个国家的工程师没有特权,高收入或高社会地位。在这种情况下,社会契约论和成员资格要求论都不具有说服力。作为一种可能在日本可行的替代方法,我提出了一种基于骄傲的观点。在美德伦理学文献中已经分析了骄傲的概念,但尚未充分挖掘这种概念的潜力。与其他自豪感不同,职业自豪感可以通过激励工程师即使在没有社会回报的情况下也能做出出色的工作,从而直接造福于大众,因为对自己的自豪感已经是一种回报。我的建议是,培养一种与职业服务在社会中的重要性相关的特殊的职业自豪感,以此作为职业诚信的动力基础。有证据表明该模型有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号