...
首页> 外文期刊>Science & Education >Naturalising Ethics: The Implications of Darwinism for the Study of Moral Philosophy
【24h】

Naturalising Ethics: The Implications of Darwinism for the Study of Moral Philosophy

机译:伦理自然化:达尔文主义对道德哲学研究的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The nature of moral values has occupied philosophers and educationalists for centuries and a variety of claims have been made about their origin and status. One tradition suggests they may be thoughts in the mind of God; another that they are eternal truths to be reached by rational reflection (much like the truths of mathematics) or alternatively through intuition; another that they are social conventions; and another (from the logical positivists) that they are not verifiable facts but simply the expression of emotional likes and dislikes. Standard introductory texts (e.g., Bowie 2004; Vardy and Grosch 1999) on the subject of ethics rarely mention Darwin or Darwinism (Mepham 2005 is a useful exception) possibly mindful of the fact that the relationship of evolutionary biology to moral questions has had a troublesome history. The effect of this has been that whole generations of moral philosophers have given the biological sciences a wide berth and consequently often remain poorly informed about recent advances in evolutionary thought and the neurosciences. On the other hand, scientists have developed interesting models of the evolution of the moral sentiments and are using new imaging techniques to explore the centres of the brain associated with emotion and motivation, but many have been fearful of committing the naturalistic fallacy and so have steered clear of extrapolating their findings to ethical questions. No one after all wants to be seen to be committing an elementary logical blunder. But in the last 20 years, evolutionary biologists have regained the confidence to explore the implications of evolution for the study of ethics (de Waal 1996; Wilson 1998; Wright 1994; Greene 2003). This paper is designed to encourage those entrusted with the teaching of ethics to be open to the potential of Darwinism as a source of ideas on the origins and status of ethical thought and behaviour. It is also hoped that it will illustrate for science educators the enormous explanatory power inherent in Darwinian thought.
机译:几个世纪以来,道德价值观的本质一直占据着哲学家和教育学家的怀抱,并且人们对其价值的起源和地位提出了各种各样的主张。一种传统认为它们可能是上帝心中的想法。另一个是它们是永恒的真理,需要通过理性的反思(就像数学的真理)或通过直觉来达到;另一个是社会习俗;另一个(来自逻辑实证主义者)认为它们不是可核实的事实,而只是情感喜恶的表达。关于伦理学的标准介绍性文本(例如Bowie 2004; Vardy和Grosch 1999)很少提及达尔文或达尔文主义(Mepham 2005是有用的例外),可能会想到以下事实:进化生物学与道德问题的关系令人生厌历史。这样做的结果是,整个世代的道德哲学家都给生物科学提供了广阔的基础,因此往往对进化思想和神经科学的最新进展知之甚少。另一方面,科学家们开发了有趣的道德情感进化模型,并正在使用新的成像技术来探索与情感和动机相关的大脑中枢,但是许多人担心犯下自然主义的谬误,因此已经转向不会将他们的发现推断为道德问题。毕竟没有人希望看到犯下基本的逻辑错误。但是在最近的20年中,进化生物学家重新获得了探索进化对伦理学研究意义的信心(de Waal 1996; Wilson 1998; Wright 1994; Greene 2003)。本文旨在鼓励那些负责伦理学教学的人们对达尔文主义作为伦理学思想和行为的起源和地位的思想来源的潜力持开放态度。还希望它能为科学教育者说明达尔文主义思想固有的巨大解释力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号