...
首页> 外文期刊>The safety & health practitioner >Tackling the safety pre-qualification problem: the debate goes on
【24h】

Tackling the safety pre-qualification problem: the debate goes on

机译:解决安全资格预审问题:辩论仍在继续

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In response to those who corresponded about the 'Safety Schemes in Procurement' initiative (SSIP) in the August Mailshot, while it is healthy to look for any downsides, let's be reasonable and keep to the facts.rnFirstly, SSIP is not a 'new money-making scheme', it is an umbrella organisation of existing safety schemes that have had the courage - and, who knows, the commercial sense-to try to address the major problem of too many safety questionnaires. This problem is causing major concern in government, the HSE, and industry itself. SSIP members have won clear HSE support (which is not given lightly) by undergoing an independent annual audit of what they do, and how. The current auditor is John Lacey, chair of the IOSH Construction Group. SSIP now has four members - CHAS, Exor, NHBC and the Safety Management Advisory Service - and other assessment schemes are welcome to join, if they meet the third-party audit criteria.
机译:为了回应那些在8月邮报中对“采购安全计划”倡议(SSIP)表示赞同的人,尽管寻找任何弊端是健康的,但让我们保持理性并保持事实。rn首先,SSIP并不是“新的赚钱计划”,它是现有安全计划的总括组织,这些计划具有勇气-并且,从商业意义上讲-试图解决太多安全调查表的主要问题。这个问题引起了政府,HSE和行业本身的极大关注。 SSIP成员通过对他们的工作及其方式进行独立的年度审核,从而获得了明确的HSE支持(这是不容忽视的)。目前的审计师是IOSH建设小组主席John Lacey。 SSIP现在有四个成员-CHAS,Exor,NHBC和安全管理咨询服务-如果符合第三方审核标准,则欢迎加入其他评估计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号