...
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >A Discourse on the Incorporation of Organizational Factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Key Questions and Categorical Review
【24h】

A Discourse on the Incorporation of Organizational Factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Key Questions and Categorical Review

机译:关于将组织因素纳入概率风险评估的话语:关键问题和分类审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents a discourse on the incorporation of organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)/probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), a topic of debate since the 1980s that has spurred discussions among industry, regulatory agencies, and the research community. The main contributions of this article include (1) identifying the four key open questions associated with this topic; (2) framing ongoing debates by considering differing perspectives around each question; (3) offering a categorical review of existing studies on this topic to justify the selection of each question and to analyze the challenges related to each perspective; and (4) highlighting the directions of research required to reach a final resolution for each question. The four key questions are: (I) How significant is the contribution of organizational factors to accidents and incidents? (II) How critical, with respect to improving risk assessment, is the explicit incorporation of organizational factors into PRA? (III) What theoretical bases are needed for explicit incorporation of organizational factors into PRA? (IV) What methodological bases are needed for the explicit incorporation of organizational factors into PRA? Questions I and II mainly analyze PRA literature from the nuclear domain. For Questions III and IV, a broader review and categorization is conducted of those existing cross-disciplinary studies that have evaluated the effects of organizational factors on safety (not solely PRA-based) to shed more light on future research needs.
机译:本文介绍了将组织因素纳入概率风险评估(PRA)/概率安全评估(PSA)的话题,自20世纪80年代以来的辩论主题,这些主题在20世纪80年代遭遇了行业,监管机构和研究界的讨论。本条的主要贡献包括(1)确定与本主题相关的四个关键开放问题; (2)通过考虑每个问题的不同观点来绘制正在进行的辩论; (3)对本课题的现有研究提供分类审查,以证明每个问题的选择,并分析与每个角度相关的挑战; (4)突出达到每个问题的最终决议所需的研究方向。这四个关键问题是:(i)组织因素对事故和事故的贡献有多重要? (ii)关于改善风险评估的批判性是如何将组织因素的明确纳入PRA? (iii)将组织因素纳入PRA的纳入哪些理论基础是什么? (iv)将组织因素的明确纳入PRA时需要哪些方法基础?问题I和II主要分析来自核领域的PRA文献。对于问题III和IV,进行了更广泛的审查和分类,这些横跨学科研究进行了评估组织因素对安全性(不仅仅是PRA的)对未来研究需求的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2020年第6期|1183-1211|共29页
  • 作者

    Pence Justin; Mohaghegh Zahra;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Dept Nucl Plasma & Radiol Engn Urbana IL USA|Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Beckman Inst Adv Sci & Technol Urbana IL USA|Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Illinois Informat Inst Urbana IL USA|Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Sociotech Risk Anal SoTeRiA Ind Affiliates Progra Grainger Coll Engn Urbana IL USA;

    Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Dept Nucl Plasma & Radiol Engn Urbana IL USA|Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Beckman Inst Adv Sci & Technol Urbana IL USA|Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Illinois Informat Inst Urbana IL USA|Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC Sociotech Risk Anal SoTeRiA Ind Affiliates Progra Grainger Coll Engn Urbana IL USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Human reliability analysis (HRA); organizational factors; probabilistic risk assessment (PRA); probabilistic safety assessment (PSA);

    机译:人力可靠性分析(HRA);组织因素;概率风险评估(PRA);概率安全评估(PSA);

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号