...
首页> 外文期刊>Reviews on environmental health >Using human epidemiological analyses to support the assessment of the impacts of coal mining on health
【24h】

Using human epidemiological analyses to support the assessment of the impacts of coal mining on health

机译:使用人类流行病学分析来支持评估煤炭开采对健康的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The potential impacts of coal mining on health have been addressed by the application of impact assessment methodologies that use the results of qualitative and quantitative analyses to support their conclusions and recommendations. Although human epidemiological analyses can provide the most relevant measures of risk of health outcomes in populations exposed to coal mining by-products, this kind of studies are seldom implemented as part of the impact assessment methods. To review the use of human epidemiological analyses in the methods used to assess the impacts of coal mining, a systematic search in the peer review literature was implemented following the PRISMA protocol. A synthesis analysis identified the methods and the measures used in the selected publications to develop a thematic review and discussion. The major methodological approaches to assess the impacts of coal mining are environmental impact assessment (EIA), health impact assessment (HIA), social impact assessment (SIA) and environmental health impact assessment (EHIA). The measures used to assess the impacts of coal mining on health were classified as the estimates from non-human-based studies such as health risk assessment (HRA) and the measures of risk from human epidemiological analyses. The inclusion of human epidemiological estimates of the populations exposed, especially the general populations in the vicinity of the mining activities, is seldom found in impact assessment applications for coal mining. These methods rather incorporate HRA measures or other sources of evidence such as qualitative analyses and surveys. The implementation of impact assessment methods without estimates of the risk of health outcomes relevant to the potentially exposed populations affects their reliability to address the environmental and health impacts of coal mining. This is particularly important for EIA applications because these are incorporated in regulatory frameworks globally. The effective characterization of the impacts of coal mining on health requires quantitative estimates of the risk, including the risk measures from epidemiological analyses of relevant human health data.
机译:煤炭开采对健康的潜在影响已通过应用影响评估方法加以解决,该方法使用定性和定量分析的结果来支持其结论和建议。尽管人类流行病学分析可以提供暴露于煤矿副产品的人群中健康结果风险的最相关度量,但很少将这种研究作为影响评估方法的一部分来实施。为了回顾人类流行病学分析在评估煤矿开采影响的方法中的使用,按照PRISMA协议在同行评审文献中进行了系统的搜索。综合分析确定了选定出版物中用于开展主题审查和讨论的方法和措施。评估煤炭开采影响的主要方法学方法是环境影响评估(EIA),健康影响评估(HIA),社会影响评估(SIA)和环境健康影响评估(EHIA)。用于评估煤矿开采对健康的影响的措施被归类为基于非人类研究(如健康风险评估(HRA))的估计值和来自人类流行病学分析的风险度量。在煤炭开采的影响评估应用中,很少发现人类流行病学估计的暴露人口,特别是采矿活动附近的一般人口。这些方法而是结合了HRA度量或其他证据来源,例如定性分析和调查。影响评估方法的实施,如果没有估计与潜在暴露人群有关的健康后果的风险,则会影响其评估煤矿开采对环境和健康影响的可靠性。这对于EIA应用程序尤其重要,因为这些应用程序已纳入全球监管框架。煤炭开采对健康的影响的有效表征需要对风险进行定量估计,包括对相关人类健康数据进行流行病学分析得出的风险度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号