首页> 外文期刊>Review of quantitative finance and accounting >Do futures lead the index under stress? Evidence from the 2015 Chinese market turmoil and its aftermath
【24h】

Do futures lead the index under stress? Evidence from the 2015 Chinese market turmoil and its aftermath

机译:期货是否在压力下导致指数? 2015年中国市场动荡及其后果的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Do index futures still lead the spot market over government intervention or under trading restrictions? This intriguing question can be explored in the context of the 2015 Chinese market turmoil with frequent government interventions and its aftermath when unprec-edentedly severe restrictions were imposed on the trading of the CSI 300 index futures. The intraday price discovery, studied via VECM, became weakly bidirectional over the boom phase from October 2014 to June 2015, in contract to the index futures' strong leading before the boom. The futures' leading status weakened drastically over the crash phase between June and September 2015, probably due to the government's interference with the stock market. Surprisingly, the futures under severe trading restrictions after the crash from September 2015 to June 2016 still led the spot weakly, and the volatility spillover to the index was somewhat significant. Policywise, the empirical findings imply that government interventions or trading restrictions weaken the functioning of markets.
机译:指数期货仍然领先政府干预或交易限制的现货市场吗?这种有趣的问题可以在2015年中国市场动荡的背景下探讨,频繁的政府干预措施及其后遗症,当据CSI 300指数期货的交易施加了不可思议的严重限制时。通过VECM研究的盘区价格发现,从2014年10月到2015年6月,在2015年10月到2015年6月,在繁荣前的指数期货强势领导的合同中,对繁荣阶段略微双向。期货领先地位在2015年6月至9月之间的崩溃阶段急剧减弱,可能是由于政府对股市的干扰。令人惊讶的是,2015年9月至2016年6月在2016年9月至2016年6月的严重交易限制下的期货仍然疲软地带来了现场,并且对指数的波动溢出有所重要。 PolicyWise,实证发现暗示政府干预或交易限制削弱了市场的运作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号