首页> 外文期刊>Review of Income and Wealth >PRIVATIZATION IF NECESSARY, BUT NOT NECESSARILY PRIVATIZATION?
【24h】

PRIVATIZATION IF NECESSARY, BUT NOT NECESSARILY PRIVATIZATION?

机译:必要时进行私有化,但是否不需要私有化?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Privatization-transferring the ownership and management of formerly state-owned enterprises into private hands-has played a central role in the market-oriented restructuring of economic policy over the past quarter-century, in both developed and developing economies. Globally, the share of state-owned enterprises in total GDP has been cut broadly in half since 1979-from about 10 percent to under 6 percent today (Glyn, 2006, p. 37). In some countries, the decline has been even more dramatic. In the U.K., for example, nationalized firms accounted for about 10 percent of GDP when Margaret Thatcher's government took office; by the time she left, it had declined to under 3 percent (and it has continued falling, although less dramatically, since then). Elsewhere, governments of all political stripes have privatized state-owned firms, and taken a range of complementary measures to enhance the influence of market forces over industrial production, infrastructure, and even public service delivery.
机译:在过去的25个世纪中,无论是在发达经济体还是在发展中经济体,私有化(将以前的国有企业的所有权和管理权转移给私人手中)都在经济政策的市场导向结构调整中发挥了核心作用。在全球范围内,自1979年以来,国有企业在GDP总量中所占的比例已从大约10%降至目前的6%以下(Glyn,2006,第37页)。在某些国家,下降幅度更大。例如在英国,玛格丽特·撒切尔(Margaret Thatcher)上台后,国有化企业约占GDP的10%。到她离开时,它已下降到3%以下(此后一直在下降,尽管幅度不那么大)。在其他地方,所有政治派别的政府都对国有企业进行了私有化,并采取了一系列补充措施,以增强市场力量对工业生产,基础设施甚至公共服务交付的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号