首页> 外文期刊>The review of financial studies >The Myth of the Credit Spread Puzzle
【24h】

The Myth of the Credit Spread Puzzle

机译:信用利差之谜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Are standard structural models able to explain credit spreads on corporate bonds? In contrast to much of the literature, we find that the Black-Cox model matches the level of investment-grade spreads well. Model spreads for speculative-grade debt are too low, and we find that bond illiquidity contributes to this underpricing. Our analysis makes use of a new approach for calibrating the model to historical default rates that leads to more precise estimates of investment-grade default probabilities.Received October 25, 2016; editorial decision January 12, 2018 by Editor Andrew Karolyi. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.
机译:标准的结构模型是否能够解释公司债券的信用利差?与许多文献相反,我们发现Black-Cox模型与投资级利差水平非常匹配。投机级债务的模型利差太低,我们发现债券流动性不足导致这种定价偏低。我们的分析利用一种新方法将模型校准为历史违约率,从而可以更精确地估算投资级违约率。2016年10月25日;编辑决定由编辑安德鲁·卡洛里(Andrew Karolyi)在2018年1月12日作出。作者提供了一个Internet附录,该附录可以在牛津大学出版社的网站上找到,也可以在线链接到最终发表的论文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号