首页> 外文期刊>Review of Economics of the Household >Why do larger families reduce parental investments in child quality, but not child quality per se?
【24h】

Why do larger families reduce parental investments in child quality, but not child quality per se?

机译:为什么较大的家庭会减少父母对儿童素质的投资,而不是儿童本身的素质呢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Becker’s Quantity–Quality model (Becker in Demographic and economic change in developed countries, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 209–240, 1960; Becker and Lewis in J Polit Econ 81(2): S279–S288, 1973; Becker and Tomes in J Polit Econ 84(4): S143–S162, 1976) suggests a trade-off between family size and parental investments in children. To date, only Cáceras-Delpiano (J Hum Resour 41(4): 738–754, 2006) tests this theory by considering private school enrolment. This study extends this work by using a unique data set containing a broader range of parental investments that are arguably linked to parental intentions for producing higher quality children, such as overall and non-sectarian private school enrolment, the number of computers in the home per child, and saving for the child’s education. Both studies find that fertility reduces parental investments. However, the literature generally finds that fertility has no impact on child outcomes. The study offers three potential explanations for this ‘puzzle’.
机译:贝克尔的数量-质量模型(发达国家的贝克尔在人口统计学和经济变化中的应用,普林斯顿大学出版社,普林斯顿,第209-240页,1960年;贝克尔和刘易斯在《政治经济学》 81(2):S279-S288,1973年;贝克尔和托姆斯J Polit Econ 84(4):S143-S162,1976年)建议在家庭规模与父母对孩子的投资之间进行权衡。迄今为止,只有卡塞拉斯(Cáceras-Delpiano)(J Hum Resour 41(4):738–754,2006)通过考虑私立学校的入学测试了这一理论。这项研究通过使用独特的数据集扩展了这项工作,该数据集包含范围更广的父母投资,可以说这些父母投资与生育更高质量的孩子的父母意图有关,例如整体和非宗派私立学校的入学人数,孩子,并为孩子的教育储蓄。两项研究均发现生育能力会减少父母的投资。但是,文献通常发现生育能力对儿童结局没有影响。该研究为这种“难题”提供了三种可能的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号