首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >How large is the Swedish 'academic' sector really? A critical analysis of the use of science and technology indicators
【24h】

How large is the Swedish 'academic' sector really? A critical analysis of the use of science and technology indicators

机译:瑞典的“学术”领域到底有多大?对科技指标使用情况的批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sweden is perceived to be top ranking, and a 'role model', in terms of its volume of academic R&D. This perception is based on analyses using two standard indicators. We assess the validity of these and argue that institutional features skew the result in favour of a high ranking. Swedish academic R&D is more appropriately characterised as average, or below average, in terms of input and above average in terms of output. Science policy makers need to acknowledge this and devise policies that strengthen, rather than threaten the functioning of an efficient system.
机译:就其学术研发量而言,瑞典被认为是排名最高的“角色模型”。这种看法是基于使用两个标准指标进行的分析。我们评估了这些方法的有效性,并认为制度特征使结果偏向高等级。瑞典的学术研发更恰当地被定义为平均投入或低于平均投入,而产出高于平均。科学决策者需要承认这一点,并制定出能够加强而不是威胁有效系统运行的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号