首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups
【24h】

In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups

机译:寻找互补资产:高科技初创企业结盟的决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why do new technology-based firms (NTBFs) cooperate? Starting from Teece's [Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15, 285-305] conceptual framework and taking advantage of subsequent literature on alliance formation in the resource and competence-based tradition and in the social structure perspective, we derive an empirical model that aims at highlighting the inducements and obstacles that these firms face in alliance formation according to firm-specific characteristics and the nature of the alliance. In particular, a distinction is made between exploitative commercial alliances and explorative technological alliances. The econometric estimates, based on a large sample of Italian young high-tech firms that are observed from 1994 to 2003, provide strong evidence supporting two key intuitions of Teece's work. First, the "combination of specialized complementary assets" appears to be a key driver of the formation of exploitative commercial alliances by NTBFs. More specifically, patent holding affects positively the likelihood to establish commercial alliances, but this propensity is found to rapidly decrease with firm size, suggesting that as long as NTBFs become larger and possess specialized commercial assets their urge for commercial alliances diminishes. Second, following the parallelism set forth by Teece between search for alliance partners and access to external financing, the analysis indicates that potentially beneficial alliances may not take place because of the high transaction costs faced by smaller NTBFs. In this respect, our results clearly support the view that sponsor institutions as public research organizations, venture and corporate venture capitalists may sensibly reduce these costs and that their role crucially depends on both the identity of the sponsor and the type of alliance. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:为何新技术型公司(NTBF)合作?从Teece的著作[Teece,D.J.,1986年开始。从技术创新中获利:对集成,协作,许可和公共政策的影响。 [研究政策15,285-305]概念框架,并利用后来在资源和能力为本的传统以及社会结构方面有关联盟形成的文献,我们得出了一个经验模型,旨在强调这些公司的诱因和障碍根据公司的特定特征和联盟的性质面对联盟的形成。特别是,在剥削性商业联盟和探索性技术联盟之间有区别。计量经济学的估计值是基于1994年至2003年观察到的大量意大利年轻高科技公司样本得出的,有力的证据支持了Teece工作的两个主要直觉。首先,“专业互补资产的组合”似乎是NTBF形成剥削性商业联盟的关键驱动力。更具体地说,专利持有对建立商业联盟的可能性产生积极影响,但是发现这种倾向随着公司规模的增加而迅速降低,这表明只要NTBF规模变大并拥有专门的商业资产,他们对商业联盟的渴望就会减弱。其次,遵循Teece提出的寻找联盟伙伴与获得外部融资之间的平行性,分析表明,由于较小的NTBF面临较高的交易成本,因此可能不会发生潜在的有利联盟。在这方面,我们的结果清楚地支持了这样的观点,即赞助机构作为公共研究组织,风险投资家和企业风险资本家可以合理地降低这些成本,并且其作用在很大程度上取决于赞助者的身份和联盟的类型。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号