首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Wind power planning and permitting: Comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries
【24h】

Wind power planning and permitting: Comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries

机译:风电规划和许可:北欧国家的比较观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare some important institutional and legal preconditions for wind power development in three Nordic countries: Denmark, Norway and Sweden. In the paper a number of historical, institutional and policy-related differences across these countries are highlighted, but most attention is paid to the various territorial planning procedures. The analysis suggests that although public economic support to wind power is necessary to promote its diffusion in the electricity system, similar policy instruments - in terms of both size and design - can induce significantly different developments depending on the legal preconditions for the location and environmental assessment of windmills. The success and failure stories of technology support policies can thus not easily be transferred across country borders. An important conclusion is that in comparison to Sweden the physical planning systems in both Denmark and Norway provide greater scope for implementing a national wind power policy at the local level. For instance, the Danish planning system is vertically integrated, and involves a designation of areas for wind power purposes in the local plans, while the municipalities in Sweden must in some way assent to (i.e., plan for) the establishment of windmills at a certain location in order for the installation to actually take place. Compared to its competitors, wind power is one of the power-generating technologies that tend to have the most to lose from the uncertainties created by planning regulations that leave much discretion to local authorities.
机译:本文的目的是分析和比较北欧三个国家(丹麦,挪威和瑞典)发展风力发电的一些重要制度和法律前提。本文强调了这些国家在历史,制度和政策方面的许多差异,但最关注的是各种领土规划程序。分析表明,尽管对风能的公共经济支持对于促进其在电力系统中的传播是必不可少的,但是根据位置和环境评估的法律前提,类似的政策工具(无论是规模还是设计)都可以引起截然不同的发展。风车。因此,技术支持政策的成功与失败故事很难跨国家转移。一个重要的结论是,与瑞典相比,丹麦和挪威的自然规划系统为在地方一级实施国家风力发电政策提供了更大的空间。例如,丹麦的规划系统是垂直整合的,涉及在地方规划中指定风能用途的区域,而瑞典的市政当局必须以某种方式同意(即规划)在特定地方建立风车。位置以便实际进行安装。与竞争对手相比,风力发电是发电技术中的一种,其往往会因规划法规带来的不确定性而损失最大,而法规制定则给地方当局留下了很大的酌处权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号