...
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options
【24h】

Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options

机译:工业中的碳捕获和生物量:技术经济分析和负排放选项的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Meeting the Paris Agreement will most likely require the combination of CO2 capture and biomass in the industrial sector, resulting in net negative emissions. CO2 capture within the industry has been extensively investigated. However, biomass options have been poorly explored, with literature alluding to technical and economic barriers. In addition, a lack of consistency among studies makes comparing the performance of CO2 capture and/or biomass use between studies and sectors difficult. These inconsistencies include differences in methodology, system boundaries, level of integration, costs, greenhouse gas intensity of feedstock and energy carriers, and capital cost estimations. Therefore, an integrated evaluation of the techno-economic performance regarding CO2 capture and biomass use was performed for five energy-intensive industrial sub-sectors. Harmonization results indicate that CO2 mitigation potentials vary for each sub-sector, resulting in reductions of 1.4-2.7 t CO2/t steel (77%-149%), 0.7 t CO2/t cement (92%), 0.2 t CO2/t crude oil (68%), 1.9 t CO2/t pulp (1663%-2548%), and 34.9 t CO2/t H-2 (313%). Negative emissions can be reached in the steel, paper and H2 sectors. Novel bio-based production routes might enable net negative emissions in the cement and (petro) chemical sectors as well. All the above-mentioned potentials can be reached for 100 (sic)/t CO2 or less. Implementing mitigation options could reduce industrial CO2 emissions by 10 Gt CO2/y by 2050, easily meeting the targets of the 2 degrees C scenario by the International Energy Agency (1.8 Gt CO2/y reduction) for the industrial sector and even the Beyond 2 degrees C scenario (4.2 Gt CO2/y reduction).
机译:会议的巴黎协定将最有可能需要二氧化碳捕集和生物质的工业部门相结合,导致净负排放。行业内的二氧化碳捕集已被广泛研究。然而,生物质选项已经很差探讨,结合文献暗指技术和经济上的障碍。此外,研究中缺乏一致性使得比较二氧化碳捕获和/或研究和部门之间难以利用的生物质的性能。这些矛盾包括原料和能源载体的温室气体强度的资本成本估计在方法论的差异,系统边界,集成度,成本和。因此,五能源密集型工业的子行业进行了技术经济性能的关于二氧化碳捕获和生物质能利用的综合评价。协调结果表明,CO2缓解潜力变化对于每个子扇区,产生的1.4-2.7吨CO2 /吨钢(77%-149%)的降低,0.7吨CO2 /吨水泥(92%),0.2吨CO2 /吨原油(68%),1.9吨CO2 /吨纸浆(1663%-2548%),34.9吨CO2 /吨H-2(313%)。负排放可在钢铁,造纸和H2部门达成。新型生物基生产工艺路线可能使水泥和(石油)化工行业净负排放为好。所有上述的电势可以为100(原文如此)到达/吨CO 2或更小。实施缓解方案到2050年的10亿吨二氧化碳/年减少工业二氧化碳排放量,容易受国际能源机构(1.8亿吨二氧化碳/年减少)满足2摄氏度方案的目标为工业界,甚至超越2度ç场景(4.2亿吨CO 2 / Y降低)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号