首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Biobased economy for Brazil: Impacts and strategies for maximizing socioeconomic benefits
【24h】

Biobased economy for Brazil: Impacts and strategies for maximizing socioeconomic benefits

机译:巴西生物化经济:最大化社会经济利益的影响和策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fossil fuels dominate the current energy and chemicals' supply and this leads to a rapid growth in global greenhouse gas emissions. One mitigation option is using renewable feedstock for materials, chemicals (ethylene, propylene, acrylic acid and butanol) and, mostly, energy carriers (biodiesel, renewable jet fuel, ethanol and bioelectricity). This study demonstrates the effects of an economy based on biomass (bioeconomy) on macroeconomic aspects through a Computable General Equilibrium model. Three scenarios for 2030 were created to compare different levels of production (amount of chemicals and energy production through fossils versus biomass) for Brazil, based on sugarcane, soy and forest crops. Two important methodological aspects of this paper are the financial support provided by the government to enable the bioeconomy, and the limitations in land use established by the needs to reduce emissions. Overall, the results show that a bioeconomy could result in almost irrelevant negative impacts on GDP and in small increases in unemployment rate comparing to the reference scenario. However, these effects could be reversed, even with no deforestation, if the livestock and agriculture sectors increased their efficiency regarding land. Most importantly, if the livestock sector worked as a source of land for other crops in the event of a bioeconomy, the socioeconomic response would be more positive than if deforestation took place.
机译:化石燃料主导了当前的能源和化学品供应,这导致全球温室气体排放的快速增长。一种缓解选项正在使用用于材料,化学品(乙烯,丙烯,丙烯酸和丁醇)的可再生原料,并且主要是能量载体(生物柴油,可再生射流,乙醇和生物电池)。本研究表明了通过可计算一般均衡模型对生物量(生物经济)基于生物量(生物经济)的经济的影响。基于甘蔗,大豆和森林作物,建立了对2030年的三种情景来比较巴西的不同水平(化学品和生物量)。本文的两个重要方法论是政府提供的财务支持,以实现生物经济,以及需要减少排放的需求所设定的土地利用的局限性。总体而言,结果表明,与参考情景相比,生物经济可能导致对GDP的几乎无关紧要的负面影响,并且在失业率的情况下略有增加。然而,如果牲畜和农业部门增加了对土地的效率,这些效果也可能逆转,即使没有森林砍伐。最重要的是,如果牲畜行业作为其他作物的土地来源,如果发生生物经济,则社会经济反应将比森林砍伐发生,更积极。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号