首页> 外文期刊>Regional science and urban economics >Small sample properties of maximum likelihood versus generalized method of moments based tests for spatially autocorrelated errors
【24h】

Small sample properties of maximum likelihood versus generalized method of moments based tests for spatially autocorrelated errors

机译:空间似然相关误差的最大似然小样本性质与基于矩量的广义方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Many applied researchers have to deal with spatially autocorrelated residuals (SAR). Available tests that identify spatial spillovers as captured by a significant SAR parameter, are either based on maximum likelihood (MLE) or generalized method of moments (GMM) estimates. This paper illustrates the properties of various tests for the null hypothesis of a zero SAR parameter in a comprehensive Monte Carlo study. The main finding is that Wald tests generally perform well regarding both size and power even in small samples. The GMM-based Wald test is correctly sized even for non-normally distributed disturbances and small samples, and it exhibits a similar power as its MLE-based counterpart. Hence, for the applied researcher the GMM Wald test can be recommended, because it is easy to implement.
机译:许多应用研究人员必须处理空间自相关残差(SAR)。可以识别由重要SAR参数捕获的空间溢出的可用测试,是基于最大似然(MLE)或广义矩量法(GMM)估计的。本文在全面的蒙特卡洛研究中说明了零SAR参数零假设的各种检验的性质。主要发现是,即使在小样本中,Wald测试通常在大小和功率方面都表现良好。即使对于非正态分布的干扰和小样本,基于GMM的Wald测试的大小也正确无误,并且与基于MLE的测试相比,具有类似的功效。因此,对于应用研究人员,可以推荐GMM Wald测试,因为它易于实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号