首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >'Justice delayed is justice denied': Records management and the travesty of justice in South Africa
【24h】

'Justice delayed is justice denied': Records management and the travesty of justice in South Africa

机译:``延误正义就是拒绝正义'':南非的记录管理和正义的嘲弄

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate the cases of "delayed and denied" justice that resulted from a lack of or poor record-keeping in the South African courts and police service with a view to encouraging proper records management. Proper records management plays a significant role in supporting the justice system. Records provide the critical evidence that a particular action or transaction took place and can be used as evidence in a court of law. Without reliable and authentic records, government cannot administer justice and, as a result, offenders can be set free while the victims are denied justice. Design/methodology/approach - Utilising content analysis, this study extracted print media articles (2000-2012) relating to the "records and justice system" from the South African Media database, which is one of the databases hosted by the South African Bibliographic and Information Network. The study selected cases reported in the media to conduct follow-up interviews with a policeman, lawyer and judge to discover the implications of the unavailability of required records in court cases. Furthermore, access was given to three selected cases that were given high profile in the media and these cases were analysed to find out what the final verdict in each case was. Findings - Results of the study suggest that some criminal cases were withdrawn due to missing dockets or cases not properly registered. In some instances, records were reconstructed, resulting in the travesty of justice. The study concludes by arguing that if records are not accounted for, lawyers, prosecutors and magistrates could dispute the authenticity of records. As a result, justice for victims would be delayed and ultimately denied while the perpetrators are freed. Research limitations/implications - The findings and recommendations of this study may go a long way in helping courts in South Africa to manage records properly to support the justice system. Furthermore, the study is a useful compilation of the importance of missing records for social purposes. Originality/value - In an attempt to show the role of records management in the administration of justice in South Africa, this study used a triangulation of data collection tools. This is a new attempt, especially in the South African context. Previous studies in southern Africa only looked at the management of records in supporting justice system.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是调查由于南非法院和警察部门缺乏或保存不良记录而导致的“延迟和拒绝”司法案件,以期鼓励适当的记录管理。适当的记录管理在支持司法系统中起着重要作用。记录提供了发生特定行动或交易的关键证据,并可在法院用作证据。没有可靠和真实的记录,政府将无法执行司法,结果,罪犯会被释放,而受害者则被剥夺司法公正。设计/方法/方法-利用内容分析,本研究从南非媒体数据库(南非书目和数据库托管的数据库之一)中提取了与“记录和司法系统”有关的印刷媒体文章(2000-2012年)。信息网络。该研究选择了媒体报道的案件,对警察,律师和法官进行后续采访,以发现法院案件中没有所需记录的含义。此外,访问了三个选定的案件,这些案件在媒体上备受瞩目,并对这些案件进行了分析,以找出每个案件的最终裁决。调查结果-研究结果表明,由于缺少羽绒被或未正确注册案件,一些刑事案件被撤回。在某些情况下,记录被重建,导致司法的荒谬。该研究的结论是,如果不对记录进行说明,律师,检察官和地方法官可能会质疑记录的真实性。结果,在释放肇事者的同时,将延迟并最终剥夺对受害者的正义。研究的局限性/含义-这项研究的发现和建议可能对帮助南非法院妥善管理记录以支持司法系统大有帮助。此外,该研究是有用的关于社会目的丢失记录的重要性的汇编。原创性/价值-为了展示记录管理在南非司法中的作用,本研究使用了三角剖分的数据收集工具。这是一种新尝试,尤其是在南非背景下。南部非洲以前的研究仅着眼于支持司法系统的记录管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号