首页> 外文期刊>Reading Psychology >Institutional Productivity Ratings Based on Publications in Nine Literacy Journals: 1992-2005
【24h】

Institutional Productivity Ratings Based on Publications in Nine Literacy Journals: 1992-2005

机译:基于九种扫盲期刊出版物的机构生产率等级:1992-2005年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study extended the work of three previous studies that compared the scholarly productivity of faculty members in universities as represented in nine literacy journals. The top 25 universities were identified and this study shows that several institutions have remained consistent through the years as those that produce the largest amount of scholarship. As in previous studies, the University of Georgia ranked first by a substantial margin. This ranking was adjusted according to faculty size, resulting in a reordering of institutions—the University of Georgia remained first. The top 22 universities publishing in two leading literacy research journals—Reading Research Quarterly and Journal of Literacy Research—were also identified. This study also indicates an increase in scholarly work by multiple authors from collaborating institutions, including those from public schools.
机译:这项研究扩展了之前的三项研究的工作,这些研究比较了以九种扫盲期刊为代表的大学教职员工的学术生产力。确定了排名前25位的大学,这项研究表明,多年来,有几所大学的奖学金数量最多,而这些大学一直保持着一致性。与以前的研究一样,乔治亚大学以相当大的优势排名第一。该排名根据教职员工人数进行了调整,从而导致各机构的重新排序—佐治亚大学排名第一。还确定了在两个领先的扫盲研究期刊(《阅读研究季刊》和《识字研究杂志》)上排名前22位的大学。这项研究还表明,来自合作机构(包括公立学校)的多位作者的学术著作有所增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reading Psychology》 |2008年第4期|315-326|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Teacher Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA;

    Department of Teacher Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:52:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号