...
首页> 外文期刊>Rail business intelligence >DfT management criticised
【24h】

DfT management criticised

机译:DfT管理层受到批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While Sir Andrew Foster's IEP review is notable for its restrained tone, there is clear criticism of DfT's strategic management. He twice quotes one of those interviewed during the review as likening DfT strategy to 'a slippery bar of soap'.rnA number of interviewees described DfT strategy as 'a move-able feast'. Foster and his team also found it difficult to 'make sense' of the multiple changes to the IEP specification (above).rnFurther uncertainty was introduced by the two radical policy changes announced by former Transport Secretary Lord Adonis: committing the last government to Great Western Main Line electrification and high-speed rail. How these changes interacted with IEP was not clear, and in the case of electrification the question arose in interviews of whether 1EP had been adequately rescoped.
机译:尽管安德鲁·福斯特爵士的IEP审查以其内敛的语调而著称,但对DfT的战略管理存在明显的批评。他两次引用了审查期间受访者中的一个,将DfT策略比作“一块光滑的肥皂”。许多受访者将DfT策略描述为“可移动的盛宴”。福斯特和他的团队还发现很难“理解” IEP规范的多重变化(上图)。进一步的不确定性是由前交通部长阿多尼斯勋爵宣布的两项重大政策变化引入的:将最后一届政府委托给大西部干线电气化和高铁。这些变化如何与IEP相互作用如何还不清楚,在电气化的情况下,有关1EP是否已得到适当审查的访谈中出现了问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Rail business intelligence》 |2010年第370期|P.8|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号