首页> 外文期刊>Quality in Higher Education >Grading and academic freedom: an English academic’s angle on Hill’s contentious triangle
【24h】

Grading and academic freedom: an English academic’s angle on Hill’s contentious triangle

机译:评分和学术自由:英国学者对希尔有争议的三角形的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Following the dismissal of a Canadian professor over disputed grading practices, Hill produced his triangle model of competing interests of academics, administrators and students. In the UK, academic freedom in relation to grading is increasingly constrained reflecting more assertive institutional management supervising over‐burdened academic staff teaching more students.View full textDownload full textKeywordsacademic freedom, assessment, grading, business improvement methodsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2011.554633
机译:在因有争议的评分标准而罢免了加拿大教授后,希尔提出了他的三角模型,该模型由学者,管理人员和学生共同竞争。在英国,与分级相关的学术自由受到越来越多的限制,这反映了更加果断的机构管理监督着负担沉重的教学人员,教给更多的学生。查看全文下载全文关键词学术自由,评估,分级,业务改进方法相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2011.554633

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号