首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Reseacrh in Psychology >Surveying Qualitative Research Teaching on British Clinical Psychology Training Programmes 1992-2006: A Changing Relationship?
【24h】

Surveying Qualitative Research Teaching on British Clinical Psychology Training Programmes 1992-2006: A Changing Relationship?

机译:1992-2006年英国临床心理学培训计划的定性研究教学调查:不断变化的关系?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There have been indications that qualitative research has become more popular in British clinical psychology, particularly amongst trainee clinical psychologists. In a 1992 survey conducted by the author, 81% of UK clinical psychology training programmes that responded reported that they taught qualitative methods for an average 4.85 hours and that only a small number of students submitted qualitative dissertations. This article reports the results of a similar survey conducted in 2005-2006. Twenty-six programmes responded (a response rate of 83.9%). In contrast to the 1992 survey, 100% of the responding programmes reported that they taught qualitative methods for an average of 12.6 hours (approximately 31.1% of total research methods teaching). The most popular methods were Grounded Theory, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and Discourse Analysis. All of the programmes reported that they would accept theses solely using qualitative methods, with an average of 42.8% of dissertations falling into this category in the previous four years. The results are discussed in the context of the development of British clinical psychology and training.View full textDownload full textKeywordsclinical psychology, qualitative research, research methods teaching, trainingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.630626
机译:有迹象表明,定性研究在英国临床心理学中越来越受欢迎,特别是在受训临床心理学家中。作者在1992年进行的一项调查中,有81%的英国临床心理学培训计划回答说,他们平均每48.85小时教授定性方法,只有少数学生提交了定性论文。本文报告了2005-2006年进行的类似调查的结果。有26个计划做出了回应(回应率为83.9%)。与1992年的调查相比,有100%的回答者报告称他们平均每学时使用定性方法12.6小时(约占全部研究方法的31.1%)。最受欢迎的方法是扎根理论,解释现象学分析和话语分析。所有程序都报告说,他们将仅使用定性方法来接受这些论文,在过去的四年中,平均有42.8%的论文属于此类。在英国临床心理学和培训发展的背景下讨论了结果。查看全文下载全文关键词临床心理学,定性研究,研究方法教学,培训相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike, netvibes,推特,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.630626

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号