...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative research journal >'You have to say everything is nice here' Complexities of gatekeeping in qualitative research in northern Mozambique
【24h】

'You have to say everything is nice here' Complexities of gatekeeping in qualitative research in northern Mozambique

机译:“你必须说这里一切都很好”莫桑比克北部定性研究中门禁的复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the author's research experiences in northern Mozambique in order explore the multiplicity of gatekeeper relations that arose while seeking to arrange access to both "the field" and respondents, as well as the impacts that these relationships had on the research process. Although this dynamic has been thoroughly described within methodological literature, there exists a tendency to presume research-gatekeeper relations as static; once established, there is little discussion on how the relationships develop or can be managed, once access has (or has not) been achieved. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws upon qualitative fieldwork conducted predominantly in rural communities in northern Mozambique. The study analysed the development of the Nacala Development Corridor programme and the N13 Highway Rehabilitation Project in northern Mozambique in order to examine the impacts of the development on local citizens and examine the relationship between citizen and state within development processes. Fieldwork consisted of three different phases of semi-structured and open-ended interviews with key stakeholders and affected persons, spanning five different interview schedules, and a total of 77 individual interviews and 27 community focus groups conducted along the N13. Findings - The study found that duality of Mozambican governance which includes both local officials and traditional leadership contributed to a multiplicity of local gatekeepers which impacted the research process in a multitude of ways. As a result, researcher-gatekeeper relations were not static, but had to be managed throughout the duration of the study. Originality/value - This discussion provides a more dynamic representation of the challenges involved with establishing and managing gatekeeper relations in rural, developing, and in particular, southern African, contexts, while offering cautious practical advice to researchers working within rural or southern African contexts.
机译:目的-本文的目的是反思作者在莫桑比克北部的研究经验,以探讨在寻求安排访问“实地”和被调查者时出现的看门人关系的多样性以及所产生的影响这些关系影响了研究过程。尽管在方法论文献中已经对这种动态进行了详尽的描述,但是有一种趋势认为研究与看门人的关系是静态的。一旦建立,一旦(或尚未)实现访问,就很少讨论如何发展或管理关系。设计/方法/方法-本文借鉴了主要在莫桑比克北部农村社区进行的定性田野调查。该研究分析了莫桑比克北部的纳卡拉发展走廊计划和N13公路修复项目的发展,以便研究发展对当地公民的影响,并研究发展过程中公民与国家之间的关系。实地调查包括与关键利益相关者和受影响人的三个不同阶段的半结构化和不限成员名额访谈,涵盖五个不同的访谈时间表,以及沿着N13进行的总共77个个人访谈和27个社区焦点小组。调查结果-研究发现,莫桑比克政府的双重性(包括地方官员和传统领导)导致了地方守门人的多元化,从而以多种方式影响了研究过程。结果,研究人员与看门人的关系不是一成不变的,而是必须在整个研究过程中加以管理。原创性/价值-该讨论更生动地代表了在农村,发展中,尤其是南部非洲的环境中建立和管理网守关系所面临的挑战,同时为在农村或南部非洲环境中工作的研究人员提供了谨慎的实践建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号