首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management >Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: the role of the editorial board
【24h】

Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: the role of the editorial board

机译:开发研究期刊和定性探究:编辑委员会的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate and evaluate the roles of research journal editorial boards in fostering scholarship and nurturing new knowledge areas and research approaches, typified by the growing qualitative methodological tradition, in the accounting and management disciplines. Design/methodology/approach – Editors and their boards are considered as trustees of both journals and their stocks of knowledge. Their profiles and multiple roles are elucidated and critiqued, and their scope of influence is delineated. Findings – The paper reviewing function is revealed as complex and multifaceted, with reviewers falling into several categories of approach to their responsibilities. Supported by journal editors, editorial board members are portrayed as having both direct action and journal policy responsibilities, accepting such positions and roles for a variety of rationales. Their responsibility for fostering the emerging qualitative research tradition in accounting and management is explored and presented as a primary example of the editorial board's role in pushing the boundaries of the discipline. Research limitations/implications – This paper offers a wider than hitherto articulated specification of the roles and contributions to disciplinary advancement potentially on offer from editors' and editorial board members' strategic approach to their roles. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first in the published accounting and management research journal literatures to focus on the roles and rationales relating to research journal editorial board membership as a foundation for the academy's knowledge construction.
机译:目的–本文的目的是调查和评估研究期刊编辑委员会在会计和管理学科中以不断发展的定性方法论传统为代表的在培养奖学金,培养新的知识领域和研究方法方面的作用。设计/方法/方法–编辑者及其董事会被视为期刊及其知识储备的受托人。阐明和批评了他们的形象和多重角色,并划定了他们的影响范围。调查结果–纸质审查功能被揭示为复杂和多方面的,审查者分为几类负责其职责的方法。在期刊编辑的支持下,编辑委员会成员被描绘为既有直接行动又有期刊政策责任,并出于各种理由接受此类职位和角色。探究了他们在会计和管理领域培养新兴的定性研究传统的责任,并将其作为编辑委员会在推动学科发展方面的作用的主要例证。研究的局限性/意义–本文提供了迄今尚未阐明的角色和对学科发展的贡献的规范,这可能是编辑和编辑委员会成员采用的角色战略方法所提供的。原创性/价值–本文是已发表的会计和管理研究期刊文献中的第一篇,着重于研究期刊编辑委员会成员的角色和理论基础,作为该学院知识建设的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号