...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Market Research >Researching family food decision making processes: highlights, hits and pitfalls when including young children's perspectives
【24h】

Researching family food decision making processes: highlights, hits and pitfalls when including young children's perspectives

机译:研究家庭食品决策过程:在内的幼儿视角包括亮点,点击和陷阱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss a number of child-centric research methods/ stimuli involving young children (5-6 years old) in interviews without, and subsequently with their parents. Existing and new methods were selected and developed for a study which aimed at obtaining insights into parents' and young children's understandings of children's influence and family interaction with regard to family food consumption practices. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 35 children were interviewed using semi-structured interviews in five kindergartens. Subsequently, 13 families were interviewed in their homes. The latter interviews included the same children as were interviewed in the kindergarten. The methods discussed include drawings, a desert-island-choice task, a sentence completion task, photographs, vignettes and a video-clip. Findings - When interviewing young children about family decision making influence, the use of engaging methods contributes to the quality of data achieved and to the participants' enjoyment of their participation. Care should be taken not to overload children with exercises. Visual rather than verbal methods worked better for engaging the children in the research process; for parents all included methods worked well. Research limitations/implications - The current study shows that a method developed specifically for the study (desert-island-choice task) was apt at including all family members' perspectives; future studies should develop methods that capture shared rather than individual experiences. The study was carried out in wealthy areas in Denmark. It would be highly relevant to broaden the sample to other socio-economic and cultural contexts. Originality/value - The study is based on interviews with children usually deemed too young to interview. The contribution is novel methods that allow for studying the interaction between children and parents and that are not based on reading and writing skills to access the perspectives of 5-6-year old children. Precautions regarding using existing methods are offered.
机译:目的 - 本文的目的是展示和讨论一些儿童的研究方法/刺激,涉及幼儿(5-6岁)在访谈中,没有,随后与父母一起。为一项研究选择并开发了现有的和新方法,该研究旨在获得父母和幼儿对儿童影响力和家庭互动方面的洞察的洞察力与家庭食品消费做法的认识。设计/方法/方法 - 使用五个幼儿园的半结构性访谈采访了35名儿童。随后,在家里接受了13个家庭。后者的访谈包括在幼儿园采访的同一个孩子。所讨论的方法包括图纸,沙漠岛选择任务,句子完成任务,照片,Vignettes和视频剪辑。调查结果 - 在采访幼儿关于家庭决策的影响时,使用接触方法的使用有助于实现的数据质量和参与者对其参与的享受。应注意不要过度锻炼儿童。视觉而不是口头方法,更好地为儿童参与研究过程;对于父母来说,所有包括方法都很好。研究限制/含义 - 目前的研究表明,专门为研究(沙漠岛屿选择任务)开发的方法是在包括所有家庭成员的观点的情况下;未来的研究应该制定捕获共享而不是个人经验的方法。该研究在丹麦的富裕地区进行。将样本扩大到其他社会经济和文化情境是高度相关的。原创/价值 - 该研究基于与儿童的访谈通常被视为年轻人面试。贡献是新的方法,允许研究儿童和父母之间的互动,而不是基于阅读和写作技能,以获得5-6岁儿童的观点。提供了使用现有方法的预防措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号