首页> 外文期刊>QJM >Current antiplatelet options for NSTE-ACS patients
【24h】

Current antiplatelet options for NSTE-ACS patients

机译:NSTE-ACS患者的当前抗血小板选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Non-ST elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction and unstable angina are the most common clinical presentations of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Platelet activation is central to the pathogenesis of NSTE-ACS and consensus guidelines that advocate early revascularization supported by intensive antiplatelet therapy. This review examines the drugs used concurrently with aspirin as dual antiplatelet therapy in the NSTE-ACS setting. Clopidogrel represented an important therapeutic advance. However, variations in platelet response and a relatively slow onset of action compromise outcomes with clopidogrel. Evidence reviewed in this article shows that in NSTE-ACS patients, ticagrelor and prasugrel are more effective than clopidogrel and are relatively well tolerated, with an acceptable and manageable bleeding risk. The literature suggests several differences between ticagrelor and prasugrel that should allow clinicians to better tailor treatment to the patient. Head-to-head comparisons are now needed to compare directly the risks and benefits of ticagrelor and prasugrel in NSTE-ACS. Further studies also need to address other outstanding issues such as the benefits and risks of prasugrel pre-treatment and to stratify efficacy and tolerability according to diabetes mellitus (DM) and other co-morbidities. In the meantime, the issues discussed in this review should enhance clinicians’ ability to optimize and individualize NSTE-ACS treatment, thereby further reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with this common cardiovascular condition.
机译:非ST抬高(NSTE)心肌梗塞和不稳定型心绞痛是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的最常见临床表现。血小板活化是NSTE-ACS发病机理的核心,也是共识指南,该指南主张通过强化抗血小板治疗支持早期血运重建。这篇综述研究了在NSTE-ACS环境中与阿司匹林同时用作双重抗血小板治疗的药物。氯吡格雷代表了重要的治疗进展。但是,血小板反应的变化和相对缓慢的起效会损害氯吡格雷的疗效。本文所审查的证据表明,在NSTE-ACS患者中,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷比氯吡格雷更有效,且耐受性相对较好,出血风险可接受且可控。文献表明替卡格雷和普拉格雷之间存在一些差异,这应该使临床医生能够更好地为患者量身定制治疗方案。现在需要进行正面对比,以直接比较NSTE-ACS中替卡格雷和普拉格雷的风险和收益。进一步的研究还需要解决其他悬而未决的问题,例如普拉格雷预处理的益处和风险,并根据糖尿病(DM)和其他合并症对疗效和耐受性进行分层。同时,本综述中讨论的问题应增强临床医生优化和个性化NSTE-ACS治疗的能力,从而进一步降低与这种常见心血管疾病相关的发病率和死亡率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《QJM》 |2012年第10期|p.935-948|共14页
  • 作者单位

    From the 1Institut de Cardiologie, INSERM UMR_S 937, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (AP-HP), 75013 Paris, France, UMPC (Paris 6) and 2Department of Cardiology, CHU Nîmes, Faculté de Médecine Montpellier-Nîmes, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:06:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号