首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Sport-decision aids and the 'CSI-effect': Why cricket uses Hawk-Eye well and tennis uses it badly
【24h】

Sport-decision aids and the 'CSI-effect': Why cricket uses Hawk-Eye well and tennis uses it badly

机译:运动决策辅助工具和“ CSI效应”:为什么板球很好地使用鹰眼,而网球却不好用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Technologies of visualisation and measurement are changing the relationship between spectators and match officials at sporting events. Umpires and referees find themselves under increasing scrutiny and sports governing bodies are experimenting with new technologies and additional "off-field" officials in order to preserve the legitimacy of decision-making. In this paper, we examine how technologies are being used in a number of sports, paying particular attention to the way in which uncertainty and indeterminacy are conveyed to viewers and spectators. The contrast between cricket and tennis is particularly instructive in this respect as the same technology is used in two very different ways. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for implementing sports measurement technologies whilst preserving the traditions of individual sports and enriching technological culture.
机译:可视化和测量技术正在改变体育赛事中观众与比赛官员之间的关系。裁判员和裁判员受到越来越严格的审查,体育理事机构正在尝试新技术和更多“场外”官员,以维护决策的合法性。在本文中,我们研究了技术在许多体育运动中的使用方式,特别注意了将不确定性和不确定性传达给观众和观众的方式。板球和网球之间的对比在这方面特别具有启发性,因为以两种截然不同的方式使用相同的技术。本文最后提出了一系列建议,以实施运动测量技术,同时保留个人运动的传统并丰富技术文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号