首页> 外文期刊>Public performance & management review >Online Versus Offline Participation: Has the Democratic Potential of the Internet Been Realized? Analysis of a Participatory Budgeting System in Korea
【24h】

Online Versus Offline Participation: Has the Democratic Potential of the Internet Been Realized? Analysis of a Participatory Budgeting System in Korea

机译:在线与离线参与:互联网的民主潜力是否已实现?韩国参与式预算制度的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have empirically examined the effectiveness of online and offline systems in involving citizens in policymaking. The present study asks whether the online and offline modes of participation vary in their impacts on policy decision-making. To answer this question, we analyze and assess the effectiveness of the two types of participation channels by tracking individual citizens' opinions proposed through the participatory budgeting system of the Bukgu (Northern) District Office in Gwangju Metropolitan City in Korea. The results show that offline participation channels are more effective than online channels because of their high levels of representativeness and deliberativeness. There is also variation between offline channels. When citizens engage in deliberative participation processes, their opinions are more likely to be reflected in budget or policy decision-making. In this sense, our study represents an initial step toward revealing the workings behind residents' participation and any resulting substantive outcomes to help local governments design effective participation channels.
机译:很少有研究从经验上检验过在线和离线系统在使公民参与决策中的有效性。本研究询问在线和离线参与模式对政策决策的影响是否不同。为了回答这个问题,我们通过跟踪韩国光州广域市北区(北)民政事务厅参与式预算系统提出的个人意见,分析和评估了两种参与渠道的有效性。结果表明,离线参与渠道比在线渠道更有效,因为它们具有很高的代表性和协商性。离线频道之间也存在差异。当公民参与审议性参与过程时,他们的意见更有可能反映在预算或政策决策中。从这个意义上讲,我们的研究是迈出揭示居民参与背后的工作方式以及由此产生的实质性成果以帮助地方政府设计有效参与渠道的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号