首页> 外文期刊>Public management review >Conviction and Punishment: Free press and competitive election as deterrents to corruption
【24h】

Conviction and Punishment: Free press and competitive election as deterrents to corruption

机译:定罪和处罚:新闻自由和竞争性选举对腐败的威慑作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Democratic institutions are not equally effective in curbing corruption. Using a criminal behavior model, this study formulates the hypothesis that corruption offenders, being risk-inclined, are deterred more by conviction-reinforcing democratic institutions than by punishment-reinforcing democratic institutions. Evidence based on cross-country regressions strongly supports this hypothesis, indicating that compared with competitive election, free press is a more effective deterrent to corruption. While shedding light on why corruption remains rampant in some electoral democracies-particularly the illiberal democracies-this study identifies a key to corruption control.
机译:民主机构在遏制腐败方面没有同样有效。这项研究使用犯罪行为模型,提出了这样一种假设,即倾向于风险的腐败犯罪者更多地是通过坚定信念的民主制度来遏制,而不是通过增强惩罚的民主制度来制止。基于跨国回归的证据有力地支持了这一假说,表明与竞争性选举相比,新闻自由是威慑腐败的更有效手段。尽管阐明了为什么在某些选举民主国家,尤其是在自由民主国家中,腐败仍然猖ramp,但这项研究确定了控制腐败的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号